From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Lukas Herbolt <lherbolt@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [Regression/Behavior change]dm-flakey corrupt read bio, even the feature is drop_writes
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:30:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c66a14e2-0c62-bf1c-bcf6-9567d5cc87ba@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM4Jq_424FJSogLYj5gcf_JsQTF8U8UjdpCbs_vpqjCtqFqXXw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Lukas,
Thanks for your patch, while I am a little concerned of it, even I'm a
newbie to flakey code.
At 08/22/2016 10:53 PM, Lukas Herbolt wrote:
> Hi Qu,
>
> Sorry for the confusion. Reading the email again and the code it seems
> that the READS are really returned as -EIO if you set the drop_writes.
> I just tested it and you are right.
>
> If I was reading the fstest correctly the flakey is created as:
> ---
> flakey: 0 409600 flakey 8:64 0 0 180 1 drop_writes
> ---
>
> I believe the READs are dropped because it does not have any flags set.
>
> ---
> if (bio_data_dir(bio) == READ) {
> /* If flags were specified, only corrupt those that match. */
> if (fc->corrupt_bio_byte && (fc->corrupt_bio_rw == READ) &&
> all_corrupt_bio_flags_match(bio, fc))
> goto map_bio;
> else
> return -EIO;
> }
> ---
>
> with conclusion of setting:
> ---
> /*
> * Flag this bio as submitted while down.
> */
> pb->bio_submitted = true;
> ---
>
> I have quick test patch ready, but it probably broke more thing than
> fixes so I will continue on it.
> Just in case you want to test it. Diff is done again 4.8-rc1
>
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-flakey.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-flakey.c
> @@ -292,6 +292,11 @@ static int flakey_map(struct dm_target *ti,
> struct bio *bio)
> * Map reads as normal only if corrupt_bio_byte set.
> */
> if (bio_data_dir(bio) == READ) {
> + /* We should retunr all READS as ok in case
> of DROP WRITES flag is set. */
> + if (test_bit(DROP_WRITES, &fc->flags)) {
> + pb->bio_submitted = false;
> + goto map_bio;
> + }
According to my personal understanding, drop_writes should:
1) Drop any write bio silently
Just as its name
2) For read
2.1) Read out data if the range doesn't include corrupt_bio_byte
2.2) Read out corrupted data if the range contains corrupt_bio_byte.
So it seems that 2.2) is not fulfilled.
While it solves the problem I reported, I'm still concerned if it
matches the correct/designed behavior of flakey.
Thanks,
Qu
> /* If flags were specified, only corrupt those
> that match. */
> if (fc->corrupt_bio_byte &&
> (fc->corrupt_bio_rw == READ) &&
> all_corrupt_bio_flags_match(bio, fc))
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Lukas Herbolt <lherbolt@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> There is patch from Mike. It's part of current pull request to 4.8-rc1
>> For more details check:
>> - https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2016-July/msg00561.html
>> - https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2016-August/msg00109.html
>>
>> Lukas
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>> Hi, Mike and btrfs and dm guys
>>>
>>> When doing regression test on v4.8-rc1, we found that fstests/btrfs/056
>>> always fails. With the following dmesg:
>>> ---
>>> Buffer I/O error on dev dm-0, logical block 1310704, async page read
>>> Buffer I/O error on dev dm-0, logical block 16, async page read
>>> Buffer I/O error on dev dm-0, logical block 16, async page read
>>> ---
>>>
>>> And bisect leads to the following commits:
>>> ---
>>> commit 99f3c90d0d85708e7401a81ce3314e50bf7f2819
>>> Author: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
>>> Date: Fri Jul 29 13:19:55 2016 -0400
>>>
>>> dm flakey: error READ bios during the down_interval
>>> ---
>>>
>>> While according to the document of dm-flakey, it says that when using
>>> drop_writes feature, read bios are not affected:
>>> ---
>>> drop_writes:
>>> All write I/O is silently ignored.
>>> Read I/O is handled correctly.
>>> ---
>>>
>>> If I understand the word "correctly" correctly, it should means READ I/0 is
>>> handled without problem.
>>>
>>> However with this commit, it also corrupt the read bio, leading to the test
>>> failure.
>>>
>>>
>>> At least there are two fixes available here;
>>> 1) Fix fstest scripts
>>> The related macro is "_flakey_drop_and_remount yes", which will
>>> check the fs during the "drop_writes" time.
>>>
>>> Currently, only btrfs/056 calls "_flakey_drop_and_remount" with
>>> "yes". So other test cases are not affected.
>>>
>>> However, even we move the fsck outside of the "drop_writes" range,
>>> although test case can pass without problem, but we will still
>>> get a dmesg error:
>>> "Buffer I/O error on dev dm-0, logical block 1310704, async page read"
>>>
>>> 2) Revert to flakey behavior to allow READ bio
>>> Then everything is back to the old good days.
>>>
>>> Not sure which one is correct for current use case, as I'm not familiar with
>>> dm codes.
>>>
>>> Any idea to fix dm-flaky and keep the READ bio behavior?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Qu
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> dm-devel mailing list
>>> dm-devel@redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lukas Herbolt
>> RHCE, RH436, BSc, SSc
>> Senior Technical Support Engineer
>> Global Support Services (GSS)
>> Email: lherbolt@redhat.com
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-23 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-22 7:31 [Regression/Behavior change]dm-flakey corrupt read bio, even the feature is drop_writes Qu Wenruo
2016-08-22 8:05 ` [dm-devel] " Lukas Herbolt
2016-08-22 14:53 ` Lukas Herbolt
2016-08-23 8:30 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2016-08-22 15:07 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-08-23 8:40 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c66a14e2-0c62-bf1c-bcf6-9567d5cc87ba@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=lherbolt@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).