From: robbieko <robbieko@synology.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Btrfs: fiemap: pass correct bytenr when fm_extent_count is zero
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 18:27:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7f76974fefae3f4162ae23335ca9971@synology.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1de45bba-fe15-d1d6-173a-741918399d69@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov 於 2018-03-07 18:19 寫到:
> On 7.03.2018 10:20, robbieko wrote:
>> From: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
>>
>> # mount /dev/vdb5 /mnt/btrfs
>> # dd if=/dev/zero bs=16K count=4 oflag=dsync of=/mnt/btrfs/file
>> # xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" /mnt/btrfs/file
>> /mnt/btrfs/file:
>> EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
>> 0: [0..127]: 25088..25215 128 0x1
>>
>> Run fiemap with fm_extent_count set to 0, we'll get wrong value 4
>> instead of 1.
>
> Wrong value 4 instead of 1 for which exact column, the flags? State
> this
> explicitly.
>
> Also this seems a bit bogus since fiemap's documentation states:
>
> If fm_extent_count is zero, then the fm_extents[] array is ignored (no
> extents will be returned), and the fm_mapped_extents count will hold
> the
> number of extents needed in fm_extents[] to hold the file's current
> mapping.
>
> So when fm_extent_count we shouldn't really be returning anything from
> kernel.
>
Sorry I did not explain clearly.
The value is fm_mapped_extents.
If fm_extent_count is zero, the fm_mapped_extents count will hold the
number of extents needed.
>
>>
>> [REASON]
>> When fm_extent_count is 0, disko is not initialized correctly,
>> The value is 0 in this case, not the right bytenr.
>
> This is too sparse, be more explicit i.e. that disko=0 is passed to
> emit_fiemap_extent which then leads to issues.
>
>>
>> [FIX]
>> Use correct disko.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 4 +---
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
>> index 012d638..066b6df 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
>> @@ -4567,7 +4567,7 @@ int extent_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct
>> fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
>> offset_in_extent = em_start - em->start;
>> em_end = extent_map_end(em);
>> em_len = em_end - em_start;
>> - disko = 0;
>> + disko = em->block_start + offset_in_extent;
>> flags = 0;
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -4590,8 +4590,6 @@ int extent_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct
>> fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
>> u64 bytenr = em->block_start -
>> (em->start - em->orig_start);
>>
>> - disko = em->block_start + offset_in_extent;
>> -
>> /*
>> * As btrfs supports shared space, this information
>> * can be exported to userspace tools via
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
>> in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-07 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-07 8:20 [PATCH 0/2] btrfs fiemap related BUG fix robbieko
2018-03-07 8:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] Btrfs: fiemap: pass correct bytenr when fm_extent_count is zero robbieko
2018-03-07 10:19 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-03-07 10:27 ` robbieko [this message]
2018-03-07 11:15 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-03-09 9:01 ` robbieko
2018-03-09 9:18 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-03-07 8:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: fix fiemap extent SHARED flag error with range clone robbieko
2018-03-07 10:33 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-03-07 10:42 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-03-07 11:01 ` robbieko
2018-03-07 11:18 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-03-07 11:27 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-03-07 12:14 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-03-07 12:17 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-03-07 12:29 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-03-07 9:27 ` [PATCH 0/2] btrfs fiemap related BUG fix Qu Wenruo
2018-03-07 9:53 ` robbieko
2018-03-27 16:51 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c7f76974fefae3f4162ae23335ca9971@synology.com \
--to=robbieko@synology.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).