linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Enhancement for block group/chunk verification
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 09:36:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c80e2352-2edd-bacf-4c22-e51155bca7d4@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180704133607.GQ3126@twin.jikos.cz>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1932 bytes --]



On 2018年07月04日 21:36, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 05:10:04PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> Can be fetched from github, which is based on v4.18-rc1 tag:
>> https://github.com/adam900710/linux/tree/tree_checker_enhance
>>
>> Reported by Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>, some crafted btrfs image can
>> cause unexpected kernel behavior.
>>
>> All of them are related to block group and chunk, so this patchset will
>> enhance block group and chunk verification, so kernel can detect them
>> and error out gracefully (with user friendly error message showing
>> what's going wrong)
>>
>> Obvious corruption (don't need to cross check with chunk/block group),
>> will be addressed by enhanced tree-checker.
>> (Most crafted images will be caught by tree-checker)
>>
>> More complex corruption will be addressed mostly at
>> btrfs_read_block_groups(), doing extra cross reference check for
>> chunk<->block group mapping.
>> It may cause extra mount time, but compared to the existing time
>> consuming block group items search, all added check is done completely
>> in memory using rb_tree, so it shouldn't add too much overhead.
>>
>> Qu Wenruo (5):
>>   btrfs: tree-checker: Verify block_group_item
>>   btrfs: tree-checker: Detect invalid empty essential tree
>>   btrfs: relocation: Only remove reloc rb_trees if reloc control has
>>     been initialized
>>   btrfs: Check each block group has corresponding chunk at mount time
>>   btrfs: Verify every chunk has corresponding block group at mount time
> 
> Patches 1-3 queued, thanks. 4 and 5 have some comments.

Did I miss the comments for 4 and 5?

I only see some discussion on "Link:" tag.

Thanks,
Qu

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-05  1:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-03  9:10 [PATCH 0/5] Enhancement for block group/chunk verification Qu Wenruo
2018-07-03  9:10 ` [PATCH 1/5] btrfs: tree-checker: Verify block_group_item Qu Wenruo
2018-07-04  2:20   ` Gu, Jinxiang
2018-07-04  5:54   ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-07-04  7:37   ` Gu, Jinxiang
2018-07-03  9:10 ` [PATCH 2/5] btrfs: tree-checker: Detect invalid empty essential tree Qu Wenruo
2018-07-04  3:42   ` Gu, Jinxiang
2018-07-04  5:56   ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-07-04  7:37   ` Gu, Jinxiang
2018-07-03  9:10 ` [PATCH 3/5] btrfs: relocation: Only remove reloc rb_trees if reloc control has been initialized Qu Wenruo
2018-07-04  5:23   ` Gu, Jinxiang
2018-07-04  7:37   ` Gu, Jinxiang
2018-07-03  9:10 ` [PATCH 4/5] btrfs: Check each block group has corresponding chunk at mount time Qu Wenruo
2018-07-04  5:45   ` Gu, Jinxiang
2018-07-05 23:41     ` Qu Wenruo
2018-07-04  6:02   ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-07-03  9:10 ` [PATCH 5/5] btrfs: Verify every chunk has corresponding block group " Qu Wenruo
2018-07-04  6:09   ` Gu, Jinxiang
2018-07-04  7:08   ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-07-04  9:46     ` Qu Wenruo
2018-07-05 23:49       ` Qu Wenruo
2018-07-05 15:18   ` David Sterba
2018-07-05 23:44     ` Qu Wenruo
2018-07-16 13:16       ` David Sterba
2018-07-16 13:57         ` Qu Wenruo
2018-07-17 12:33           ` David Sterba
2018-07-17 13:32             ` Qu Wenruo
2018-07-19 14:22               ` David Sterba
2018-07-04 13:36 ` [PATCH 0/5] Enhancement for block group/chunk verification David Sterba
2018-07-05  1:36   ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2018-07-05 15:18     ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c80e2352-2edd-bacf-4c22-e51155bca7d4@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).