linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 rev log added] fstests: btrfs verify hardening agaist duplicate fsid
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 23:57:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cbdb0ebb-0bd4-561e-4509-096a72c4e710@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8003c16e-1eef-1e7e-d697-11d8d32c2e91@suse.com>



On 10/26/2018 11:52 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> 
> 
> On 26.10.18 г. 18:34 ч., Anand Jain wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/26/2018 11:02 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8.10.18 г. 21:28 ч., Anand Jain wrote:
>>>> We have a known bug in btrfs, that we let the device path be changed
>>>> after the device has been mounted. So using this loop hole the new
>>>> copied device would appears as if its mounted immediately after its
>>>> been copied. So this test case reproduces this issue.
>>>>
>>>> For example:
>>>>
>>>> Initially.. /dev/mmcblk0p4 is mounted as /
>>>>
>>>> lsblk
>>>> NAME        MAJ:MIN RM  SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
>>>> mmcblk0     179:0    0 29.2G  0 disk
>>>> |-mmcblk0p4 179:4    0    4G  0 part /
>>>> |-mmcblk0p2 179:2    0  500M  0 part /boot
>>>> |-mmcblk0p3 179:3    0  256M  0 part [SWAP]
>>>> `-mmcblk0p1 179:1    0  256M  0 part /boot/efi
>>>>
>>>> btrfs fi show
>>>> Label: none  uuid: 07892354-ddaa-4443-90ea-f76a06accaba
>>>>       Total devices 1 FS bytes used 1.40GiB
>>>>       devid    1 size 4.00GiB used 3.00GiB path /dev/mmcblk0p4
>>>>
>>>> Copy mmcblk0 to sda
>>>> dd if=/dev/mmcblk0 of=/dev/sda
>>>>
>>>> And immediately after the copy completes the change in the device
>>>> superblock is notified which the automount scans using
>>>> btrfs device scan and the new device sda becomes the mounted root
>>>> device.
>>>>
>>>> lsblk
>>>> NAME        MAJ:MIN RM  SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
>>>> sda           8:0    1 14.9G  0 disk
>>>> |-sda4        8:4    1    4G  0 part /
>>>> |-sda2        8:2    1  500M  0 part
>>>> |-sda3        8:3    1  256M  0 part
>>>> `-sda1        8:1    1  256M  0 part
>>>> mmcblk0     179:0    0 29.2G  0 disk
>>>> |-mmcblk0p4 179:4    0    4G  0 part
>>>> |-mmcblk0p2 179:2    0  500M  0 part /boot
>>>> |-mmcblk0p3 179:3    0  256M  0 part [SWAP]
>>>> `-mmcblk0p1 179:1    0  256M  0 part /boot/efi
>>>> btrfs fi show /
>>>> Label: none  uuid: 07892354-ddaa-4443-90ea-f76a06accaba
>>>>       Total devices 1 FS bytes used 1.40GiB
>>>>       devid    1 size 4.00GiB used 3.00GiB path /dev/sda4
>>>>
>>>> The bug is quite nasty that you can't either unmount /dev/sda4 or
>>>> /dev/mmcblk0p4. And the problem does not get solved until you take
>>>> the sda out of the system on to another system to change its fsid using
>>>> the 'btrfstune -u' command.
>>>
>>> Is there a pending fix for this?
>>
>> Yes.
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10641041/
>>
>> Test case header mentioned it.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> v1->v2:
>>>>     dont play around with dev patch use it as it is.
>>>>     do not use SCRATCH_MNT instead create it at the TEST_DIR and its
>>>> related
>>>>      changes.
>>>>     golden out changes
>>>>        tests/btrfs/173     | 88
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    tests/btrfs/173.out |  6 ++++
>>>>    tests/btrfs/group   |  1 +
>>>>    3 files changed, 95 insertions(+)
>>>>    create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/173
>>>>    create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/173.out
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/173 b/tests/btrfs/173
>>>> new file mode 100755
>>>> index 000000000000..b466ae921e19
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/173
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
>>>> +#! /bin/bash
>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>> +# Copyright (c) 2018 Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
>>>> +#
>>>> +# FS QA Test 173
>>>> +#
>>>> +# Fuzzy test for FS image duplication.
>>>> +#  Could be fixed by
>>>> +#    [patch] btrfs: harden agaist duplicate fsid
>>>> +#
>>>> +seq=`basename $0`
>>>> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
>>>> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
>>>> +
>>>> +here=`pwd`
>>>> +tmp=/tmp/$$
>>>> +status=1    # failure is the default!
>>>> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
>>>> +
>>>> +mnt=$TEST_DIR/$seq.mnt
>>>> +_cleanup()
>>>> +{
>>>> +    rm -rf $mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
>>>> +    cd /
>>>> +    rm -f $tmp.*
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
>>>> +. ./common/rc
>>>> +. ./common/filter
>>>> +
>>>> +# remove previous $seqres.full before test
>>>> +rm -f $seqres.full
>>>> +
>>>> +# real QA test starts here
>>>> +
>>>> +# Modify as appropriate.
>>>> +_supported_fs btrfs
>>>> +_supported_os Linux
>>>> +_require_scratch_dev_pool 2
>>>> +_scratch_dev_pool_get 2
>>>> +
>>>> +dev_foo=$(echo $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL | awk '{print $1}')
>>>> +dev_bar=$(echo $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL | awk '{print $2}')
>>>
>>> Naming devices _foo and _bar just shows you could not care less about
>>> the test.
>>
>>    Hmm. Will make it device_1 and device_2.
>>
>>> Either use sane names - primary_dev/secondary dev or device_1
>>> and device_2.
>>
>>>> +
>>>> +echo dev_foo=$dev_foo >> $seqres.full
>>>> +echo dev_bar=$dev_bar >> $seqres.full
>>>> +echo | tee -a $seqres.full
>>>> +
>>>> +rm -rf $mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
>>>
>>> So what is $mnt? I can see it's used by very few tests and it's not
>>> obvious? Generally you should either define it as a local variable or
>>> use one of the SCRATCH_MNT/TEST_MNT global variables. Also I checked
>>> with Eric re. the use of $mnt in tests and his conclusion is :
>>>
>>> "<sandeen> looks like a bug"
>>
>>   No its not. As few lines above, I have assigned it as..
>>      mnt=$TEST_DIR/$seq.mnt
> 
> I missed that, I will recommend moving the assignment near where you set
> the devices

  cleanup() is using $mnt. cleanup() may get called for any trap before 
the actual test.

Thanks, Anand


>>
>>
>>>> +mkdir $mnt
>>>> +_mkfs_dev $dev_foo
>>>> +_mount $dev_foo $mnt
>>>> +
>>>> +check_btrfs_mount()
>>>> +{
>>>> +    local x=$(findmnt $mnt | grep -v TARGET | awk '{print $2}')
>>>> +    [[ $x == $dev_foo ]] && echo DEV_FOO
>>>> +    [[ $x == $dev_bar ]] && echo DEV_BAR
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> Same thing here re. DEV_(FOO|BAR).
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +echo MNT $(check_btrfs_mount)
>>>> +
>>>> +for sb_bytenr in 65536 67108864
>>>> +do
>>>> +    echo -n "dd status=none if=$dev_foo of=$dev_bar bs=1 "\
>>>> +        "seek=$sb_bytenr skip=$sb_bytenr count=4096" >> $seqres.full
>>>> +    dd status=none if=$dev_foo of=$dev_bar bs=1 seek=$sb_bytenr \
>>>> +                skip=$sb_bytenr count=4096 >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>>>> +    echo ..:$? >> $seqres.full
>>>
>>> This is an overkill, just use dd ... >/dev/null 2>&1, no one cares about
>>> the output of that. Also use DIO so that sb's are directly written to
>>> the devices.
>>
>>   Yeah right will fix.
>>
>>>> +done
>>>> +
>>>> +#Original device is mounted, scan of its clone should fail
>>>> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device scan $dev_bar >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>>>> +echo btrfs device scan dev_bar ...:$?| tee -a $seqres.full
>>>> +
>>>> +echo MNT $(check_btrfs_mount)
>>>> +
>>>> +#Original device scan should be successful
>>>> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device scan $dev_foo >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>>>> +echo btrfs device scan dev_foo ...:$?| tee -a $seqres.full
>>>> +
>>>> +umount $mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
>>>> +_scratch_dev_pool_put
>>>> +
>>>> +# success, all done
>>>> +status=0
>>>> +exit
>>>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/173.out b/tests/btrfs/173.out
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..3c7e3fb4e3f7
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/173.out
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
>>>> +QA output created by 173
>>>> +
>>>> +MNT DEV_FOO
>>>> +btrfs device scan dev_bar ...:1
>>>> +MNT DEV_FOO
>>>> +btrfs device scan dev_foo ...:0
>>>
>>> It seems the output is really pointless it should just be "Silence is
>>> golden". Then in the test you would do all your run-time checks of
>>> what's the source of the mount etc etc and if your expectations don't
>>> match you fail the test and don't output "Silence is golden" which would
>>> signal success. Check for example
>>
>>   I could do that. Will fix.
>>
>> Thanks, Anand
>>
>>>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/group b/tests/btrfs/group
>>>> index 45782565c3b7..b2f1393f3e97 100644
>>>> --- a/tests/btrfs/group
>>>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/group
>>>> @@ -175,3 +175,4 @@
>>>>    170 auto quick snapshot
>>>>    171 auto quick qgroup
>>>>    172 auto quick punch
>>>> +173 volume
>>>>
>>

      reply	other threads:[~2018-10-26 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-01  8:44 [PATCH] fstests: btrfs verify hardening agaist duplicate fsid Anand Jain
2018-10-06 10:14 ` Eryu Guan
2018-10-08 18:28   ` Anand Jain
2018-10-08 18:14 ` [PATCH v2] " Anand Jain
2018-10-08 18:28 ` [PATCH v2 rev log added] " Anand Jain
2018-10-21 10:25   ` Eryu Guan
2018-10-26 15:02   ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-10-26 15:34     ` Anand Jain
2018-10-26 15:52       ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-10-26 15:57         ` Anand Jain [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cbdb0ebb-0bd4-561e-4509-096a72c4e710@oracle.com \
    --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nborisov@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).