linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>
To: Jarkko Lavinen <jlavi@iki.fi>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] Btrfs scrub sometime recalculate wrong parity in raid5
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:56:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc93fc7e-2bbf-40c3-807e-2b7d0b962335@libero.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160716155111.GA9751@ks392938.kimsufi.com>

Hi

On 2016-07-16 17:51, Jarkko Lavinen wrote:
> On 07/12/2016 05:50 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
>> Using "btrfs insp phy" I developed a script to trigger the bug.
> 
> Thank you for the script and all for sharing the raid5 and scrubbing
> issues. I have been using two raid5 arrays and ran scrub occasionally
> without any problems lately and been in false confidence. I converted
> successfully raid5 arrays into raid10 without any glitch.
> 
> I tried to modify the shell script so that instead of corrupting data
> with dd, a simulated bad block is created with device mapper. Modern
> disks are likely to either return the correct data or an error if
> they cannot.


You are right; but doing so we are complicating further the test case:
- my tests show what happen when there is a corruption, but the drive behaves well
- your tests show what happen when there is a corruption AND the drive has a failure

I agree that your simulation is more realistic, but I fear that doing so we are complicating the bug finding.

> 
> The modified script behaves very much like the original dd version.
> With dd version I see wrong data instead of expected data. 

When toy say "I see wrong data", you means with 
1) "cat mnt/out.txt" 
or 2) with "dd if=/dev/loop....." ?

In the first case I see always good data; in the second case I see wrong data but of course no reading error

> With simulated bad block I see no data at all instead of expected data
> since dd quits on read error.
> 
> Jarkko Lavinen
> 


-- 
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D  17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5



  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-07-18 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-12 21:50 [BUG] Btrfs scrub sometime recalculate wrong parity in raid5: take two Goffredo Baroncelli
2016-07-14 21:20 ` Chris Mason
2016-07-15  4:39   ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-07-15 13:20     ` Chris Mason
2016-07-15 15:10       ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-07-15 15:21         ` Chris Mason
2016-07-15 16:30     ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2016-07-15 16:28   ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2016-07-15 16:29     ` Chris Mason
2016-07-15 16:34       ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-07-16 15:51 ` [BUG] Btrfs scrub sometime recalculate wrong parity in raid5 Jarkko Lavinen
2016-07-17 19:46   ` Jarkko Lavinen
2016-07-18 18:56   ` Goffredo Baroncelli [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-08-19 13:17 Philip Espunkt
2016-06-25 12:21 Goffredo Baroncelli
2016-06-25 17:25 ` Chris Murphy
2016-06-25 17:58   ` Chris Murphy
2016-06-25 18:42     ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2016-06-25 22:33       ` Chris Murphy
2016-06-26  9:20         ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2016-06-26 16:43           ` Chris Murphy
2016-06-26  2:53   ` Duncan
2016-06-26 22:33     ` ronnie sahlberg
2016-06-26 22:38       ` Hugo Mills
2016-06-27  3:22         ` Steven Haigh
2016-06-27  3:21       ` Steven Haigh
2016-06-27 19:47         ` Duncan
2016-06-27  3:50       ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2016-06-27  4:35         ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-06-27 16:39           ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2016-09-21  7:28 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-09-21  7:35   ` Tomasz Torcz
2016-09-21  9:15     ` Qu Wenruo
2016-09-21 15:13       ` Chris Murphy
2016-09-22  2:08         ` Qu Wenruo
2016-09-22  2:44           ` Chris Murphy
2016-09-22  3:00             ` Qu Wenruo
2016-09-22  3:12               ` Chris Murphy
2016-09-22  3:07           ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2016-09-22  3:18             ` Qu Wenruo
2016-09-21 15:02   ` Chris Murphy
2016-11-04  2:10 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-05  7:23   ` Goffredo Baroncelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cc93fc7e-2bbf-40c3-807e-2b7d0b962335@libero.it \
    --to=kreijack@libero.it \
    --cc=jlavi@iki.fi \
    --cc=kreijack@inwind.it \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).