From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] btrfs: don't call bioset_integrity_create for btrfs_bioset
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 13:06:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf1e829d-bbe7-8948-0de4-a2d6cd774de8@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220806080330.3823644-2-hch@lst.de>
On 06/08/2022 16:03, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> btrfs never uses bio integrity data itself, so don't allocate
> the integrity pools for btrfs_bioset.
>
(I couldn't catch up with v1 / v2, sorry for the late comments).
Two questions:
This patch is a revert of the commit b208c2f7ceaf ("btrfs: Fix crash
due to not allocating integrity data for a set"). So nowadays, integrity
data pool allocation is not mandatory?
Why not complete the support of bio integrity metadata instead?
Thanks, Anand
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
> Tested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> index 6e8e936a8a1ef..ca8b79d991f5e 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> @@ -255,14 +255,8 @@ int __init extent_io_init(void)
> BIOSET_NEED_BVECS))
> goto free_buffer_cache;
>
> - if (bioset_integrity_create(&btrfs_bioset, BIO_POOL_SIZE))
> - goto free_bioset;
> -
> return 0;
>
> -free_bioset:
> - bioset_exit(&btrfs_bioset);
> -
> free_buffer_cache:
> kmem_cache_destroy(extent_buffer_cache);
> extent_buffer_cache = NULL;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-08 5:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-06 8:03 btrfs I/O completion cleanup and single device I/O optimizations v3 Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-06 8:03 ` [PATCH 01/11] btrfs: don't call bioset_integrity_create for btrfs_bioset Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-08 5:06 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2022-08-08 6:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-08 11:24 ` Anand Jain
2022-08-06 8:03 ` [PATCH 02/11] btrfs: move btrfs_bio allocation to volumes.c Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-10 14:42 ` Anand Jain
2022-08-06 8:03 ` [PATCH 03/11] btrfs: pass the operation to btrfs_bio_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-08 11:20 ` Anand Jain
2022-08-06 8:03 ` [PATCH 04/11] btrfs: don't take a bio_counter reference for cloned bios Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-18 11:30 ` Anand Jain
2022-08-06 8:03 ` [PATCH 05/11] btrfs: remove bioc->stripes_pending Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-18 11:33 ` Anand Jain
2022-08-18 23:36 ` Anand Jain
2022-08-18 23:37 ` Anand Jain
2022-08-06 8:03 ` [PATCH 06/11] btrfs: properly abstract the parity raid bio handling Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-06 8:03 ` [PATCH 07/11] btrfs: give struct btrfs_bio a real end_io handler Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-19 6:20 ` Anand Jain
2022-08-06 8:03 ` [PATCH 08/11] btrfs: split submit_stripe_bio Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-19 23:37 ` Anand Jain
2022-08-19 23:56 ` Anand Jain
2022-08-06 8:03 ` [PATCH 09/11] btrfs: simplify the submit_stripe_bio calling convention Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-19 23:53 ` Anand Jain
2022-08-06 8:03 ` [PATCH 10/11] btrfs: make the btrfs_io_context allocation in __btrfs_map_block optional Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-20 11:34 ` Anand Jain
2022-08-06 8:03 ` [PATCH 11/11] btrfs: stop allocation a btrfs_io_context for simple I/O Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-23 4:33 ` btrfs I/O completion cleanup and single device I/O optimizations v3 Anand Jain
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-07-13 6:13 btrfs I/O completion cleanup and single device I/O optimizations v2 Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-13 6:13 ` [PATCH 01/11] btrfs: don't call bioset_integrity_create for btrfs_bioset Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cf1e829d-bbe7-8948-0de4-a2d6cd774de8@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).