linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, clm@fb.com
Subject: [PULL][PATCH 0/2 v2] Balance filters: stripes, enhanced limit
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 18:50:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1445013000.git.dsterba@suse.com> (raw)

Changelog (v2):
* the limit_min logic was wrong and did not work, all other filters are locally
  applied to the processed chunk, but for the limit_min we need to count all
  filters first and then decide if we want to rebalance or not

Update to balance filters, intended for 4.4:

* new 'stripes=<range>' - process only stripes that cross given number of
  devices, specified by a range

* updated 'limit=<range>' - previously a single number was accepted, it's a
  range so now we can specify a minimum number of chunks to process

There will be more documentation about the use in the btrfs-progs patches, the
kernel side just applies the ranges. The update to 'limit' is backward
compatible, reuses the previous struct member.

Need the v2 btrfs-progs patchset.

Note to merging: there's a missing patch that actuall adds both filter flags
to the mask, however this patch[1] will supposedly be merged to 4.3-rc6.
Current integration is based on 4.3-rc5 so I can't send a branch containing
that without pulling unrelated patches. I'll send the patch independently so
you can decide how to apply it once your first 4.4 pull request gets merged.

[1] btrfs: check unsupported filters in balance arguments
    (8eb934591f8bf584969454a658f629cd06e59f3a)

----------------------------------------------------------------

The following changes since commit 049e6dde7e57f0054fdc49102e7ef4830c698b46:

  Linux 4.3-rc4 (2015-10-04 16:57:17 +0100)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux.git dev/balance-filters

for you to fetch changes up to 9811b51815f9b5874832bbfa56a5171bac6aae7d:

  btrfs: add balance filter for stripes (2015-10-16 15:50:00 +0200)

----------------------------------------------------------------
David Sterba (1):
      btrfs: extend balance filter limit to take minimum and maximum

Gabríel Arthúr Pétursson (1):
      btrfs: add balance filter for stripes

 fs/btrfs/ctree.h           | 23 ++++++++++++++---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c         | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/btrfs/volumes.h         |  2 ++
 include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h | 23 +++++++++++++++--
 4 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

             reply	other threads:[~2015-10-16 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-16 16:50 David Sterba [this message]
2015-10-16 16:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: extend balance filter limit to take minimum and maximum David Sterba
2015-10-16 23:08   ` Zygo Blaxell
2015-10-19  9:14     ` David Sterba
2015-10-19 15:31       ` Zygo Blaxell
2015-10-16 16:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: add balance filter for stripes David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1445013000.git.dsterba@suse.com \
    --to=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).