[PATCH 0/4] Slightly how START_SYNC and WAIT_SYNC work

[David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>]

The async transaction commit ioctl has a subtle semantics that used to
work for ceph. We need more straightforward semantics in progs (eg. when
waiting for commit after subvolume deletion) and otherwise the async
commit does a few annoying things.

Long explanation is in patch 3. I hope it works, but somebody please
double check. It's a minor change in the commit logic, but merely
removing some waiting, no other changes in state transitions.

David Sterba (4):
  btrfs: sink wait_for_unblock parameter to async commit
  btrfs: inline wait_current_trans_commit_start in its caller
  btrfs: replace async commit by pending actions
  btrfs: remove fs_info::transaction_blocked_wait

 fs/btrfs/ctree.h       |   1 -
 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c     |   5 +-
 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c       |  12 ++---
 fs/btrfs/super.c       |   1 -
 fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 103 +----------------------------------------
 fs/btrfs/transaction.h |   2 -
 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-)

-- 
2.31.1