From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] btrfs: preparation patches for the incoming metadata folio conversion
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:49:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1689061099.git.wqu@suse.com> (raw)
[BACKGROUND]
Recently I'm checking on the feasibility on converting metadata handling
to go a folio based solution.
The best part of using a single folio for metadata is, we can get rid of
the complexity of cross-page handling, everything would be just a single
memory operation on a continuous memory range.
[PITFALLS]
One of the biggest problem for metadata folio conversion is, we still
need the current page based solution (or folios with order 0) as a
fallback solution when we can not get a high order folio.
In that case, there would be a hell to handle the four different
combinations (folio/folio, folio/page, page/folio, page/page) for extent
buffer helpers involving two extent buffers.
[OBJECTIVE]
So this patchset is the preparation to reduce direct page operations for
metadata.
The patchset would do this mostly be concentrate the operations to use
the common helper, write_extent_buffer() and read_extent_buffer().
For bitmap operations it's much complex, thus this patchset refactor it
completely to go a 3 part solution:
- Handle the first byte
- Handle the byte aligned ranges
- Handle the last byte
This needs more complex testing (which I failed several times during
development) to prevent regression.
Finally there is only one function which can not be properly migrated,
memmove_extent_buffer(), which has to use memmove() calls, thus must go
per-page mapping handling.
Thankfully if we go folio in the end, the folio based handling would
just be a single memmove(), thus it won't be too much burden.
Qu Wenruo (6):
btrfs: tests: enhance extent buffer bitmap tests
btrfs: refactor extent buffer bitmaps operations
btrfs: use write_extent_buffer() to implement
write_extent_buffer_*id()
btrfs: refactor memcpy_extent_buffer()
btrfs: refactor copy_extent_buffer_full()
btrfs: call copy_extent_buffer_full() inside
btrfs_clone_extent_buffer()
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 219 ++++++++++++++-----------------
fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c | 161 +++++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 176 deletions(-)
--
2.41.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-07-11 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-11 7:49 Qu Wenruo [this message]
2023-07-11 7:49 ` [PATCH 1/6] btrfs: tests: enhance extent buffer bitmap tests Qu Wenruo
2023-07-11 7:49 ` [PATCH 2/6] btrfs: refactor extent buffer bitmaps operations Qu Wenruo
2023-07-11 7:49 ` [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: use write_extent_buffer() to implement write_extent_buffer_*id() Qu Wenruo
2023-07-11 17:02 ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-07-11 22:43 ` Qu Wenruo
2023-07-11 7:49 ` [PATCH 4/6] btrfs: refactor memcpy_extent_buffer() Qu Wenruo
2023-07-11 7:49 ` [PATCH 5/6] btrfs: refactor copy_extent_buffer_full() Qu Wenruo
2023-07-11 7:49 ` [PATCH 6/6] btrfs: call copy_extent_buffer_full() inside btrfs_clone_extent_buffer() Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1689061099.git.wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox