From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/8] btrfs: separate/simplify/unify subpage handling
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 18:07:15 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1738127135.git.wqu@suse.com> (raw)
[METADATA SUBPAGE CHECKS]
Currently we only have one btrfs_is_subpage() check, utilized by data
and metadata.
But the truth is, btrfs_is_subpage() can return incorrect result if the
target folio belongs to a dummy extent buffer.
This means we have quite some metadata call sites doing their own
metadata specific subpage check.
[SUBPAGE SPECIFIC HANDLINGS]
There are several functions that split the metadata subpage handling
into a dedicated path.
But the truth is, a lot of such paths only have minor differences
compared to the regular routine.
[THIS SERIES]
This series address the above problems and prepare for the incoming data
larger folio support by:
- Remove btrfs_fs_info::sectors_per_page
This is mostly a preparation for the future data larger folio support.
- Introduce a dedicated metadata specific subpage check
- Unify/simplify metadata subpage handling
So that we have a single unified path for metadata
Qu Wenruo (8):
btrfs: remove btrfs_fs_info::sectors_per_page
btrfs: extract metadata subpage detection into a dedicated helper
btrfs: make subpage attach and detach to handle metadata properly
btrfs: use metadata specific helpers to simplify extent buffer helpers
btrfs: simplify btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty()
btrfs: simplify write_one_eb()
btrfs: simplify read_extent_buffer_pages_nowait()
btrfs: require strict data/metadata split for subpage check
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 5 +-
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 193 +++++++++++++++----------------------------
fs/btrfs/fs.h | 7 +-
fs/btrfs/subpage.c | 173 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
fs/btrfs/subpage.h | 50 +++++++++--
5 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 206 deletions(-)
--
2.48.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-01-29 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-29 7:37 Qu Wenruo [this message]
2025-01-29 7:37 ` [PATCH 1/8] btrfs: remove btrfs_fs_info::sectors_per_page Qu Wenruo
2025-01-29 7:37 ` [PATCH 2/8] btrfs: extract metadata subpage detection into a dedicated helper Qu Wenruo
2025-01-29 7:37 ` [PATCH 3/8] btrfs: make subpage attach and detach to handle metadata properly Qu Wenruo
2025-01-29 7:37 ` [PATCH 4/8] btrfs: use metadata specific helpers to simplify extent buffer helpers Qu Wenruo
2025-01-29 7:37 ` [PATCH 5/8] btrfs: simplify btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty() Qu Wenruo
2025-02-06 3:21 ` Qu Wenruo
2025-01-29 7:37 ` [PATCH 6/8] btrfs: simplify write_one_eb() Qu Wenruo
2025-01-29 7:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] btrfs: simplify read_extent_buffer_pages_nowait() Qu Wenruo
2025-01-29 7:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] btrfs: require strict data/metadata split for subpage check Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1738127135.git.wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox