From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] btrfs: move some features out of experimental
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 14:03:42 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1772162871.git.wqu@suse.com> (raw)
[CHANGELOG]
v2:
- Move bs < ps && bs != 4K out of experimental
That feature is a pretty small niche though.
The basis is already there from the bs < ps support for a while.
- Remove 2K block size support
That is too niche, considering how easy to trigger subpage routine
with the larger data folio support, there is not much need for it.
The following features can be moved out of experimental in v7.1:
- Large data folios
It's introduced in v6.17, but we still have a bug fix related for it
in v6.19.
If there is no new bug exposed I believe it's time to expose this
feature to end users.
- Shutdown and remove_bdev callbacks
It's introduced in v6.19, but there is no major known bug exposed yet.
Furthermore the remove_bdev callback, aka auto-shutdown/degradation
when a device is missing, can affect end users.
Thus we want some feedbacks from early adopters.
- Block size smaller than page size but not 4K support
The requirement for 4K block size is purely artificial to reduce our
test load.
But since we're moving towards supporting all block sizes, the
artifical limit can be lifted now.
Qu Wenruo (4):
btrfs: drop 2K block size support
btrfs: move shutdown and remove_bdev callbacks out of experimental
features
btrfs: move larger data folios out of experimental features
btrfs: move block size < page size support out of experimental
features
fs/btrfs/Kconfig | 4 +---
fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h | 2 --
fs/btrfs/fs.c | 16 ++++------------
fs/btrfs/fs.h | 11 +----------
fs/btrfs/super.c | 4 ----
5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-02-27 3:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-27 3:33 Qu Wenruo [this message]
2026-02-27 3:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] btrfs: drop 2K block size support Qu Wenruo
2026-03-04 3:48 ` David Sterba
2026-03-04 3:51 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-02-27 3:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] btrfs: move shutdown and remove_bdev callbacks out of experimental features Qu Wenruo
2026-02-27 3:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] btrfs: move larger data folios " Qu Wenruo
2026-03-10 6:43 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-10 7:03 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-03-10 7:21 ` Oliver Sang
2026-03-10 7:58 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-03-11 13:38 ` Oliver Sang
2026-02-27 3:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] btrfs: move block size < page size support " Qu Wenruo
2026-03-04 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] btrfs: move some features out of experimental David Sterba
2026-03-04 4:04 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-03-16 8:58 ` David Sterba
2026-03-16 9:16 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1772162871.git.wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox