From: Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@gmail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs performance, sudden drop to 0 IOPs
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:56:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d0gnqb-u59.ln1@hurikhan77.spdns.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CABdHLQ7QPjUbzqNdzCfR0QxC-0coYs0dofuFvsROYXy-M9u4ig@mail.gmail.com
P. Remek <p.remek1@googlemail.com> schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I am benchmarking Btrfs and when benchmarking random writes with fio
> utility, I noticed following two things:
>
> 1) On first run when target file doesn't exist yet, perfromance is
> about 8000 IOPs. On second, and every other run, performance goes up
> to 70000 IOPs. Its massive difference. The target file is the one
> created during the first run.
>
> 2) There are windows during the test where IOPs drop to 0 and stay 0
> about 10 seconds and then it goes back again, and after couple of
> seconds again to 0. This is reproducible 100% times.
>
> Can somobody shred some light on what's happening?
I'm not an expert or dev but it's probably due to btrfs doing some
housekeeping under the hood. Could you check the output of "btrfs filesystem
usage /mountpoint" while running the test? I'd guess there's some pressure
on the global reserve during those times.
> Command: fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1
> --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test9 --filename=test9 --bs=4k --iodepth=256
> --size=10G --numjobs=1 --readwrite=randwrite
>
> Environment:
> CPU: dual socket: E5-2630 v2
> RAM: 32 GB ram
> OS: Ubuntu server 14.10
> Kernel: 3.19.0-031900rc2-generic
> btrfs tools: Btrfs v3.14.1
> 2x LSI 9300 HBAs - SAS3 12/Gbs
> 8x SSD Ultrastar SSD1600MM 400GB SAS3 12/Gbs
>
> Regards,
> Premek
--
Replies to list only preferred.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-09 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-09 17:26 btrfs performance, sudden drop to 0 IOPs P. Remek
2015-02-09 19:56 ` Kai Krakow [this message]
2015-02-09 22:21 ` P. Remek
2015-02-10 6:58 ` Kai Krakow
2015-02-10 4:42 ` Duncan
2015-02-10 17:44 ` P. Remek
2015-02-12 2:10 ` Duncan
2015-02-12 4:33 ` Kai Krakow
2015-02-12 12:21 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-02-12 19:42 ` Kai Krakow
2015-02-13 13:16 ` P. Remek
2015-02-13 18:26 ` Kai Krakow
2015-02-13 13:08 ` P. Remek
2015-02-13 2:46 ` Liu Bo
2015-02-13 3:55 ` Wang Shilong
2015-02-13 13:18 ` P. Remek
2015-02-11 12:40 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-02-12 4:59 ` Liu Bo
2015-02-13 13:06 ` P. Remek
2015-02-13 14:08 ` Liu Bo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d0gnqb-u59.ln1@hurikhan77.spdns.de \
--to=hurikhan77@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox