Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: report filemap_fdata<write|wait>_range error
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 15:18:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3a646ed-ce67-4380-82f9-920fcbec5300@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <041bef79-743b-4726-adee-9c0ddf332e6b@gmx.com>



On 4/18/24 14:30, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2024/4/18 15:44, Anand Jain 写道:
>> In the function btrfs_write_marked_extents() and in 
>> __btrfs_wait_marked_extents()
>> return the actual error if when filemap_fdata<write|wait>_range() fails.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
> 
> Looks fine for the patch, although I have a small question.
> 
> If we failed to write some metadata extents, we break out, meaning there
> would be dirty metadata still hanging there.
> 
> Would it be a problem?
> 

I had the exact same question, but what I discovered is that the
error originated here will lead to our handle errors and to readonly
state. So it should be fine. Further, if submit layer write/wait is
failing there is nothing much we can do as of now. However, in the
long run we probably should provide an option to fail-safe.

Thanks, Anand

> Thanks,
> Qu
>> ---
>> v2: add __btrfs_wait_marked_extents() as well.
>>
>>   fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 4 ++++
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
>> index 3e3bcc5f64c6..8c3b3cda1390 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
>> @@ -1156,6 +1156,8 @@ int btrfs_write_marked_extents(struct 
>> btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>>           else if (wait_writeback)
>>               werr = filemap_fdatawait_range(mapping, start, end);
>>           free_extent_state(cached_state);
>> +        if (werr)
>> +            break;
>>           cached_state = NULL;
>>           cond_resched();
>>           start = end + 1;
>> @@ -1198,6 +1200,8 @@ static int __btrfs_wait_marked_extents(struct 
>> btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>>           if (err)
>>               werr = err;
>>           free_extent_state(cached_state);
>> +        if (werr)
>> +            break;
>>           cached_state = NULL;
>>           cond_resched();
>>           start = end + 1;

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-18  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-16  2:36 [PATCH 1/1] btrfs: report filemap_fdata<write|wait>_range error Anand Jain
2024-04-18  6:14 ` [PATCH v2] " Anand Jain
2024-04-18  6:30   ` Qu Wenruo
2024-04-18  7:18     ` Anand Jain [this message]
2024-04-18  7:22       ` Qu Wenruo
2024-04-18  8:23         ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d3a646ed-ce67-4380-82f9-920fcbec5300@oracle.com \
    --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox