From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Assertion and debugging helpers
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 20:25:56 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dbdf0811-6359-428b-bf23-79e793973c12@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1744794336.git.dsterba@suse.com>
在 2025/4/16 18:38, David Sterba 写道:
> Hi,
>
> this is a RFC series. We need to improve debugging and logging helpers
> so there's no ASSERT(0) or the convoluted
> WARN_ON(IS_DEFINED(CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG)). This was mentioned in past
> discussions so here's my proposal.
>
> The series is only build tested, I'd like to hear some feedback if this
> is going the right direction or if there are suggestions for fine
> tuning.
>
> 1) Add verbose ASSERT macro, so we can print additional information when
> it triggers, namely printing the values of the assertion expression.
> More details in the first patch, basic pattern is something like
>
> VASSERT(value > limit, "value=%llu limit=%llu", value, limit);
I think the idea is pretty good for debug.
I have hit too many cases where outputting the values will immediately
help me pinning down the cause, other than adding extra outputs and then
curse myself being too stupid.
But the concern is, we already have too many different debugging tools
just inside btrfs:
- btrfs_warn()/btrfs_err()/btrfs_crit()
These are the most sane ones so far, and they saves us a lot of time
debugging things like memory bitflip in tree-checkers.
- btrfs_debug()
Looks like the least used ones, if someone is actively utilizing it,
please let me know.
- WARN_ON()
- ASSERT()
I'm definitely the abuser, almost all my patches have utilized one at
least.
Now we will have another one, and we will need another set of rules for
the newer one.
I know everyone loves new things, but I think we should sometimes to get
it more consistent.
So, if we're pushing towards VASSERT(), then it should replace all
ASSERT() eventually. At least mark the ASSERT() macro deprecated and
stop new usages.
>
> The second patch shows it's application in volumes.c, converting about
> half where it's relevant. There are about 800 assertions in fs/btrfs/
> and we don't need to convert them all. This can be done incrementally
> and as needed.
>
> The verbose version is another macro, although with some preprocessor
> magic it should be possible to make ASSERT take variable number of
> arguments. Does not seem worth though.
>
> 2) Wrap WARN_ON(IS_DEFINED(CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG)) to DEBUG_WARN() with
> optional message with printk format. This is used to replace the
> WARN_ON(...) above and also the ASSERT(0).
This looks very fine to me, independent from the VASSERT() part.
Thanks,
Qu>
> The ultimate goal for me is to get rid of all ASSERT(0), it's not used
> consistently and looks like it's a note to the code author. There may be
> several reasons for it's use and although I've converted almost all to
> DEBUG_WARN it may miss the intentions.
>
> In some cases it may be better to add proper error handling, print a
> message or warn and exit with error. Possibly the are cases where the
> code cannot continue, meaning it should be a BUG_ON but this is also
> something we want to convert to proper error handling.
>
> David Sterba (5):
> btrfs: add verbose version of ASSERT
> btrfs: example use of VASSERT() in volumes.c
> btrfs: add debug build only WARN
> btrfs: convert WARN_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG)) to DEBUG_WARN
> btrfs: convert ASSERT(0) to DEBUG_WARN()
>
> fs/btrfs/backref.c | 4 +--
> fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c | 2 +-
> fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 2 +-
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 2 +-
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2 +-
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 4 +--
> fs/btrfs/extent_map.c | 2 +-
> fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c | 27 +++++++++-------
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 6 ++--
> fs/btrfs/messages.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++
> fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 6 ++--
> fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 4 +--
> fs/btrfs/send.c | 4 +--
> fs/btrfs/space-info.c | 2 +-
> fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 8 ++---
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> fs/btrfs/zoned.c | 2 +-
> 17 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-16 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-16 9:08 [PATCH 0/5] Assertion and debugging helpers David Sterba
2025-04-16 9:08 ` [PATCH 1/5] btrfs: add verbose version of ASSERT David Sterba
2025-04-16 15:03 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-04-16 19:30 ` David Sterba
2025-04-16 9:08 ` [PATCH 2/5] btrfs: example use of VASSERT() in volumes.c David Sterba
2025-04-16 9:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] btrfs: add debug build only WARN David Sterba
2025-04-16 9:08 ` [PATCH 4/5] btrfs: convert WARN_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG)) to DEBUG_WARN David Sterba
2025-04-16 9:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] btrfs: convert ASSERT(0) to DEBUG_WARN() David Sterba
2025-04-16 10:55 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2025-04-16 20:20 ` [PATCH 0/5] Assertion and debugging helpers David Sterba
2025-04-16 22:30 ` David Sterba
2025-04-16 22:44 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dbdf0811-6359-428b-bf23-79e793973c12@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox