From: Larkin Lowrey <llowrey@nuclearwinter.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>,
Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Cc: Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Scrub aborts due to corrupt leaf
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:44:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd08eb00-faf8-cd88-aeb6-e5ed75a2889f@nuclearwinter.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c7290ea-668d-c10a-9328-91adfac14d5a@nuclearwinter.com>
On 9/11/2018 11:23 AM, Larkin Lowrey wrote:
> On 8/29/2018 1:32 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>> On 2018/8/28 下午9:56, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 7:42 AM, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2018/8/28 下午9:29, Larkin Lowrey wrote:
>>>>> On 8/27/2018 10:12 PM, Larkin Lowrey wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/27/2018 12:46 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>>>>>> The system uses ECC memory and edac-util has not reported any
>>>>>>>> errors.
>>>>>>>> However, I will run a memtest anyway.
>>>>>>> So it should not be the memory problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW, what's the current generation of the fs?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> # btrfs inspect dump-super <device> | grep generation
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The corrupted leaf has generation 2862, I'm not sure how recent
>>>>>>> did the
>>>>>>> corruption happen.
>>>>>> generation 358392
>>>>>> chunk_root_generation 357256
>>>>>> cache_generation 358392
>>>>>> uuid_tree_generation 358392
>>>>>> dev_item.generation 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't recall the last time I ran a scrub but I doubt it has been
>>>>>> more than a year.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am running 'btrfs check --init-csum-tree' now. Hopefully that
>>>>>> clears
>>>>>> everything up.
>>>>> No such luck:
>>>>>
>>>>> Creating a new CRC tree
>>>>> Checking filesystem on /dev/Cached/Backups
>>>>> UUID: acff5096-1128-4b24-a15e-4ba04261edc3
>>>>> Reinitialize checksum tree
>>>>> csum result is 0 for block 2412149436416
>>>>> extent-tree.c:2764: alloc_tree_block: BUG_ON `ret` triggered,
>>>>> value -28
>>>> It's ENOSPC, meaning btrfs can't find enough space for the new csum
>>>> tree
>>>> blocks.
>>> Seems bogus, there's >4TiB unallocated.
>> What a shame.
>> Btrfs won't try to allocate new chunk if we're allocating new tree
>> blocks for metadata trees (extent, csum, etc).
>>
>> One quick (and dirty) way to avoid such limitation is to use the
>> following patch
>
>> <<patch removed>>
>
> No luck.
>
> # ./btrfs check --init-csum-tree /dev/Cached/Backups
> Creating a new CRC tree
> Opening filesystem to check...
> Checking filesystem on /dev/Cached/Backups
> UUID: acff5096-1128-4b24-a15e-4ba04261edc3
> Reinitialize checksum tree
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> btrfs[16575]: segfault at 7ffc4f74ef60 ip 000000000040d4c3 sp
> 00007ffc4f74ef50 error 6 in btrfs[400000+bf000]
>
> # ./btrfs --version
> btrfs-progs v4.17.1
>
> I cloned btrfs-progs from git and applied your patch.
>
> BTW, I've been having tons of trouble with two hosts after updating
> from kernel 4.17.12 to 4.17.14 and beyond. The fs will become
> unresponsive and all processes will end up stuck waiting on io. The
> system will end up totally idle but unable perform any io on the
> filesystem. So far things have been stable after reverting back to
> 4.17.12. It looks like there was a btrfs change in 4.17.13. Could that
> be related to this csum tree corruption?
About once a week, or so, I'm running into the above situation where FS
seems to deadlock. All IO to the FS blocks, there is no IO activity at
all. I have to hard reboot the system to recover. There are no error
indications except for the following which occurs well before the FS
freezes up:
BTRFS warning (device dm-3): block group 78691883286528 has wrong amount
of free space
BTRFS warning (device dm-3): failed to load free space cache for block
group 78691883286528, rebuilding it now
Do I have any options other the nuking the FS and starting over?
--Larkin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-10 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-26 20:45 Scrub aborts due to corrupt leaf Larkin Lowrey
2018-08-27 0:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-08-27 2:32 ` Larkin Lowrey
2018-08-27 4:46 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-08-28 2:12 ` Larkin Lowrey
2018-08-28 3:29 ` Chris Murphy
2018-08-28 13:29 ` Larkin Lowrey
2018-08-28 13:42 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-08-28 13:56 ` Chris Murphy
2018-08-29 1:27 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-08-29 5:32 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-09-11 15:23 ` Larkin Lowrey
2018-10-10 15:44 ` Larkin Lowrey [this message]
2018-10-10 16:04 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2018-10-10 17:25 ` Larkin Lowrey
2018-10-10 18:20 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2018-10-10 18:31 ` Larkin Lowrey
2018-10-10 19:53 ` Chris Murphy
2018-10-10 23:43 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-10 17:44 ` Chris Murphy
2018-10-10 18:25 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2018-10-10 23:55 ` Hans van Kranenburg
2018-10-11 2:12 ` Larkin Lowrey
2018-10-11 2:51 ` Chris Murphy
2018-10-11 3:07 ` Larkin Lowrey
2018-10-11 4:00 ` Chris Murphy
2018-10-11 4:15 ` Chris Murphy
2018-12-31 15:52 ` Larkin Lowrey
2019-01-01 0:12 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-01-01 2:38 ` Larkin Lowrey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd08eb00-faf8-cd88-aeb6-e5ed75a2889f@nuclearwinter.com \
--to=llowrey@nuclearwinter.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).