Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	Linux BTRFS Mailinglist <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] btrfs: sysfs: export supported checksums
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 08:47:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <de46a7df-37e6-e04e-6a58-9e8380a39dbd@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191007154602.GF2751@twin.jikos.cz>

On 07/10/2019 17:46, David Sterba wrote:
[...]
>> nit: This function is used only once and the ARRAY_SIZE() macro is
>> descriptive enough, why not just remove it and opencoude the call to
>> array_size
> 
> Agreed, ARRAY_SIZE in loops is fine, it's a compile-time constant.

Nope, btrfs_csums[] is defined in ctree.c, so I can't get the size of
this array outside of ctree.c. And it was moved to ctree.c from ctree.h
on request by David.

-- 
Johannes Thumshirn                            SUSE Labs Filesystems
jthumshirn@suse.de                                +49 911 74053 689
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5
90409 Nürnberg
Germany
(HRB 247165, AG München)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-08  6:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-07  9:11 [PATCH 0/4] Add xxhash64 and sha256 as possible new checksums Johannes Thumshirn
2019-10-07  9:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] btrfs: add xxhash64 to checksumming algorithms Johannes Thumshirn
2019-10-07  9:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] btrfs: add sha256 " Johannes Thumshirn
2019-10-07  9:11 ` [PATCH 3/4] btrfs: sysfs: export supported checksums Johannes Thumshirn
2019-10-07 15:36   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-10-07 15:46     ` David Sterba
2019-10-08  6:47       ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2019-10-08 11:40         ` David Sterba
2019-10-07  9:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] btrfs: show used checksum driver per filesystem in sysfs Johannes Thumshirn
2019-10-07 14:58 ` [PATCH 0/4] Add xxhash64 and sha256 as possible new checksums Nikolay Borisov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=de46a7df-37e6-e04e-6a58-9e8380a39dbd@suse.de \
    --to=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nborisov@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox