Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Harmstone <mark@harmstone.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, dsterba@suse.cz
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, boris@bur.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: don't force DIO writes to be serialized
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:26:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e3efca03-c57a-4c55-abfb-81b767cb41e5@harmstone.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a405a46-d210-453e-ae72-7730172cfe71@suse.com>

On 23/04/2026 11.20 am, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2026/4/23 19:34, Mark Harmstone 写道:
>> On 22/04/2026 9.57 pm, David Sterba wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 03:03:35PM +0100, Mark Harmstone wrote:
>>>> Before btrfs switched to the new mount API in 2023, we were setting
>>>> SB_NOSEC in btrfs_mount_root(). This flag tells the VFS that the
>>>> filesystem may have files which don't have security xattrs, enabling it
>>>> to do some optimizations.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately this was missed in the transition, meaning that IS_NOSEC
>>>> will always return false for a btrfs inode. This means that
>>>> btrfs_direct_write() calls will always get the inode lock exclusively,
>>>> meaning that DIO writes to the same file will be serialized.
>>>>
>>>> On my machine, this one-line change results in a ~59% improvement in
>>>> DIO
>>>> throughput:
>>>
>>> That's quite an improvement. What's the actual fio script you've used?
>>> Also the DIO depends on the block group profile wrt the buffered
>>> fallback so that would be good to know too.
>>
>> It is. There's a big dropoff in DIO write performance in 6.8 that we
>> never recovered from.
> 
> There is the bounded page solution from iomap already, which will no
> longer fallback to buffered IO but to use extra page copy to make sure
> the final bio won't change its content halfway.
> 
> IIRC it's one extra flag and remove the btrfs' specific fallback checks,
> but I haven't yet verified the behavior/code.
> 
> Thanks,
> Qu

That sounds like a different thing - this is just making it so that
we're not forced to take the inode rwsem exclusively for each write.

>> I'm going to look into some sort of automated performance so this kind
>> of thing can't happen casually.
>>
>> This was on a VM with 8 cores and 8GB of RAM, with a real NVMe exposed
>> through PCI passthrough. The figures for XFS and ext4 in comparison
>> are both about ~3GB/s.
>>
>> # cat go
>> #!/bin/bash
>> mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/nvme0n1
>> mount /dev/nvme0n1 /mnt/test
>> mkdir /mnt/test/nocow
>> chattr +C /mnt/test/nocow
>> fio /root/test.fio
>>
>> # cat /root/test.fio
>> [global]
>> rw=randwrite
>> ioengine=io_uring
>> iodepth=64
>> size=1g
>> direct=1
>> startdelay=20
>> force_async=4
>> ramp_time=5
>> runtime=60
>> group_reporting=1
>> numjobs=32
>> time_based
>> disk_util=0
>> clat_percentiles=0
>> disable_lat=1
>> disable_clat=1
>> disable_slat=1
>> filename=/mnt/test/nocow/fiofile
>> [test]
>> name=test
>> bs=4k
>> stonewall
>>
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-23 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-22 14:03 [PATCH] btrfs: don't force DIO writes to be serialized Mark Harmstone
2026-04-22 20:57 ` David Sterba
2026-04-23 10:04   ` Mark Harmstone
2026-04-23 10:20     ` Qu Wenruo
2026-04-23 10:26       ` Mark Harmstone [this message]
2026-04-24 10:28     ` David Sterba
2026-04-28 15:13 ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e3efca03-c57a-4c55-abfb-81b767cb41e5@harmstone.com \
    --to=mark@harmstone.com \
    --cc=boris@bur.io \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox