From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: do not clear page dirty at extent_write_cache_pages()
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 15:58:05 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e50756fa-f062-4786-9eaf-402c9f263b08@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d1e442ad-ca7d-46e6-a68b-34908d25b44e@suse.com>
在 2024/5/20 15:34, Qu Wenruo 写道:
>
>
> 在 2024/5/20 13:00, Qu Wenruo 写道:
>> [PROBLEM]
>> Currently we call folio_clear_dirty_for_io() for the locked dirty folio
>> inside extent_write_cache_pages().
>>
>> However this call is not really subpage aware, it's from the older days
>> where one page can only have one sector.
>>
>> But with nowadays subpage support, we can have multiple sectors inside
>> one page, thus if we clear the whole page dirty flag, it would make the
>> subpage and page dirty flags desynchronize.
>>
>> Thankfully this is not a big deal as our current subpage routine always
>> call __extent_writepage_io() for all the subpage dirty ranges, thus it
>> would ensure there is no subpage range dirty left.
>>
>> [FIX]
>> So here we just drop the folio_clear_dirty_for_io() call, and let
>> __extent_writepage_io() and extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() (which is for
>> compression path) to handle the dirty page and subapge clearing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
>
> Please drop the patch.
>
> Weirdly with this one, generic/027 would hang on locking the page...
More weirdly, this only happens for aarch64 subpage cases...
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>> ---
>> This patch is independent from the subpage zoned fixes, thus it can be
>> applied either before or after the subpage zoned fixes.
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
>> index 7275bd919a3e..a8fc0fcfa69f 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
>> @@ -2231,8 +2231,7 @@ static int extent_write_cache_pages(struct
>> address_space *mapping,
>> folio_wait_writeback(folio);
>> }
>> - if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
>> - !folio_clear_dirty_for_io(folio)) {
>> + if (folio_test_writeback(folio)) {
>> folio_unlock(folio);
>> continue;
>> }
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-20 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-20 3:30 [PATCH] btrfs: do not clear page dirty at extent_write_cache_pages() Qu Wenruo
2024-05-20 6:04 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-05-20 6:28 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e50756fa-f062-4786-9eaf-402c9f263b08@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox