From: Henning Rohlfs <x+btrfs@xehonk.de>
To: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Abysmal Performance
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:15:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e5b85820126546a3369499aebb166c60@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1308669852.2106.7.camel@ayu>
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:24:11 -0400, Calvin Walton wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 23:51 +0200, Henning Rohlfs wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've migrated my system to btrfs (raid1) a few months ago. Since=20
>> then
>> the performance has been pretty bad, but recently it's gotten
>> unbearable: a simple sync called while the system is idle can take=20
>> 20 up
>> to 60 seconds. Creating or deleting files often has several seconds
>> latency, too.
>
> I think I=E2=80=99ve been seeing a fairly similar, or possibly the sa=
me?=20
> issue
> as well. It looks like it=E2=80=99s actually a regression introduced =
in=20
> 2.6.39 -
> if I switch back to a 2.6.38 kernel, my latency issues magically go
> away! (I'm curious: does using the older 2.6.38.x kernel help with
> anyone else that's seeing the issue?)
>
> Some hardware/configuration details:
> btrfs on a single disc (Seagate Momentus XT hybrid), lzo compression=20
> and
> space cache enabled. Some snapshots in use.
>
> I notice that in latencytop I'm seeing a lot of lines with (cropped)
> traces like
>
> sleep_on_page wait_on_page_bit read_extent_buffer_ 13.3 msec =
=20
> 0.5 %
>
> showing up that I didn't see with the 2.6.38 kernel. I occasionally=20
> see
> latencies as bad as 20-30 seconds on operations like fsync or
> synchronous writes.
>
> I think I can reproduce the issue well enough to bisect it, so I=20
> might
> give that a try. It'll be slow going, though.
You are right. This seems to be a regression in the .39 kernel. I=20
tested with 2.6.38.2 just now and the performance is back to normal.
Thanks,
Henning
server ~ # uname -a
Linux server 2.6.38.2 #1 SMP Thu Apr 14 13:05:35 CEST 2011 x86_64 AMD=20
Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
server ~ # sync; time sync
real 0m0.144s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.020s
server ~ # bonnie++ -d tmp -u 0:0
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-=20
--Random-
Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--=20
--Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP =
=20
/sec %CP
server 16G 147 97 279933 56 73245 34 1258 78 102379 2=
3=20
177.3 50
Latency 423ms 103ms 645ms 163ms 404ms =
=20
264ms
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random=20
Create--------
server -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---=20
-Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP =
=20
/sec %CP
16 3784 28 +++++ +++ 8519 60 13694 59 +++++ +++=20
11710 76
Latency 127ms 1024us 18718us 15958us 119us =
=20
2459us
1.96,1.96,server,1,1308745595,16G,,147,97,279933,56,73245,34,1258,78,1=
02379,23,177.3,50,16,,,,,3784,28,+++++,+++,8519,60,13694,59,+++++,+++,1=
1710,76,423ms,103ms,645ms,163ms,404ms,264ms,127ms,1024us,18718us,15958u=
s,119us,2459us
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-22 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-20 21:51 Abysmal Performance Henning Rohlfs
2011-06-21 0:12 ` Josef Bacik
2011-06-21 7:10 ` Henning Rohlfs
2011-06-21 8:00 ` Sander
2011-06-21 9:26 ` Henning Rohlfs
2011-06-21 15:18 ` Josef Bacik
2011-06-21 16:55 ` Henning Rohlfs
2011-06-21 15:24 ` Calvin Walton
2011-06-22 14:15 ` Henning Rohlfs [this message]
2011-06-22 15:39 ` Josef Bacik
2011-06-22 15:57 ` Calvin Walton
2011-06-22 15:58 ` Josef Bacik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-29 14:46 abysmal performance John Wyzer
2011-04-29 15:01 ` Chris Mason
2011-04-30 17:33 ` Mitch Harder
2011-04-30 20:40 ` John Wyzer
2011-04-30 22:16 ` Mitch Harder
2011-04-30 22:33 ` John Wyzer
2011-05-03 11:05 ` Chris Mason
2011-05-03 11:06 ` Chris Mason
2011-04-30 23:55 ` Peter Stuge
2011-05-03 10:33 ` Bernhard Schmidt
2011-05-03 11:00 ` cwillu
2011-05-03 11:26 ` Bernhard Schmidt
2011-05-03 11:08 ` Chris Mason
2011-05-03 11:30 ` Bernhard Schmidt
2011-05-03 11:36 ` Chris Mason
2011-05-03 11:43 ` Bernhard Schmidt
2011-05-03 12:52 ` Chris Mason
2011-05-03 13:03 ` Bernhard Schmidt
2011-05-03 13:41 ` Mitch Harder
2011-05-03 14:41 ` Daniel J Blueman
2011-05-03 15:42 ` Mitch Harder
2011-05-03 16:51 ` Chris Mason
2011-05-03 14:54 ` Daniel J Blueman
2011-05-03 15:10 ` Bernhard Schmidt
[not found] ` <1304100271-sup-4177@localhost>
[not found] ` <1304100862-sup-1493@think>
[not found] ` <1304107977-sup-3815@localhost>
[not found] ` <1304110058-sup-7292@think>
[not found] ` <1304146193-sup-2200@localhost>
2011-04-30 20:51 ` John Wyzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e5b85820126546a3369499aebb166c60@localhost \
--to=x+btrfs@xehonk.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).