From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@google.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+9bbbacfbf1e04d5221f7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
dsterba@suse.cz, bakmitopiacibubur@boga.indosterling.com,
clm@fb.com, davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org,
dsterba@suse.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
jirislaby@kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, kadlec@netfilter.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
pablo@netfilter.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [btrfs?] [netfilter?] BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low! (2)
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 09:18:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6d1bf573d535612c2be1f45e7197affe92df639.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230719203030.1296596a@kernel.org>
On Wed, 2023-07-19 at 20:30 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 01:12:07 +0200 Florian Westphal wrote:
> > I don't see any netfilter involvement here.
> >
> > The repro just creates a massive amount of team devices.
> >
> > At the time it hits the LOCKDEP limits on my test vm it has
> > created ~2k team devices, system load is at +14 because udev
> > is also busy spawing hotplug scripts for the new devices.
> >
> > After reboot and suspending the running reproducer after about 1500
> > devices (before hitting lockdep limits), followed by 'ip link del' for
> > the team devices gets the lockdep entries down to ~8k (from 40k),
> > which is in the range that it has on this VM after a fresh boot.
> >
> > So as far as I can see this workload is just pushing lockdep
> > past what it can handle with the configured settings and is
> > not triggering any actual bug.
>
> The lockdep splat because of netdevice stacking is one of our top
> reports from syzbot. Is anyone else feeling like we should add
> an artificial but very high limit on netdev stacking? :(
We already have a similar limit for xmit: XMIT_RECURSION_LIMIT. I guess
stacking more then such devices will be quite useless/non functional.
We could use such value to limit the device stacking, too.
Cheers,
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-20 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <000000000000a054ee05bc4b2009@google.com>
2023-07-19 9:32 ` [syzbot] [btrfs?] [netfilter?] BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low! (2) syzbot
2023-07-19 17:04 ` David Sterba
2023-07-19 17:11 ` syzbot
2023-07-19 17:14 ` Aleksandr Nogikh
2023-07-19 23:12 ` Florian Westphal
2023-07-20 3:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-20 7:18 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e6d1bf573d535612c2be1f45e7197affe92df639.camel@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=bakmitopiacibubur@boga.indosterling.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nogikh@google.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=syzbot+9bbbacfbf1e04d5221f7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).