Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, ralphgauges@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: ctree: Add extra level check for read_node_slot()
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 22:46:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e73f1311-6f60-ef51-dff1-eda03061df70@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180207143536.GB3003@twin.jikos.cz>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3339 bytes --]



On 2018年02月07日 22:35, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 05:18:25PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> Strangely, we have level check in btrfs_print_tree() while we don't have
>> the same check in read_node_slot().
>>
>> That's to say, for the following corruption, btrfs_search_slot() or
>> btrfs_next_leaf() can return invalid leaf:
>>
>> Parent eb:
>>   node XXXXXX level 1
>>               ^^^^^^^
>>               Child should be leaf (level 0)
>>   ...
>>   key (XXX XXX XXX) block YYYYYY
>>
>> Child eb:
>>   leaf YYYYYY level 1
>>               ^^^^^^^
>>               Something went wrong now
>>
>> And for the corrupted leaf returned, later caller can be screwed up
>> easily.
>>
>> Although the root cause (powerloss, but still something wrong breaking
>> metadata CoW of btrfs) is still unknown, at least enhance btrfs-progs to
>> avoid SEGV.
>>
>> Reported-by: Ralph Gauges <ralphgauges@googlemail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
>> ---
>>  ctree.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/ctree.c b/ctree.c
>> index 4fc33b14000a..ddb1e9cc6d37 100644
>> --- a/ctree.c
>> +++ b/ctree.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>  #include "repair.h"
>>  #include "internal.h"
>>  #include "sizes.h"
>> +#include "messages.h"
>>  
>>  static int split_node(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root
>>  		      *root, struct btrfs_path *path, int level);
>> @@ -640,7 +641,9 @@ static int bin_search(struct extent_buffer *eb, struct btrfs_key *key,
>>  struct extent_buffer *read_node_slot(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>>  				   struct extent_buffer *parent, int slot)
>>  {
>> +	struct extent_buffer *ret;
>>  	int level = btrfs_header_level(parent);
>> +
>>  	if (slot < 0)
>>  		return NULL;
>>  	if (slot >= btrfs_header_nritems(parent))
>> @@ -649,8 +652,16 @@ struct extent_buffer *read_node_slot(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>>  	if (level == 0)
>>  		return NULL;
>>  
>> -	return read_tree_block(fs_info, btrfs_node_blockptr(parent, slot),
>> +	ret = read_tree_block(fs_info, btrfs_node_blockptr(parent, slot),
> 
> The result of read_tree_block should be checked before use, by
> extent_buffer_uptodate, null check or IS_ERR at least (depending on the
> context of use).

Right, just forgot that.

Will fix it in next version.

Thanks,
Qu

> 
>>  		       btrfs_node_ptr_generation(parent, slot));
>> +	if (btrfs_header_level(ret) != level - 1) {
>> +		error("child eb corrupted: parent bytenr=%llu item=%d parent level=%d child level=%d",
>> +		      btrfs_header_bytenr(parent), slot,
>> +		      btrfs_header_level(parent), btrfs_header_level(ret));
>> +		free_extent_buffer(ret);
>> +		return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
>> +	}
>> +	return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static int balance_level(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>> -- 
>> 2.16.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 520 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2018-02-07 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-07  9:18 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: ctree: Add extra level check for read_node_slot() Qu Wenruo
2018-02-07 14:35 ` David Sterba
2018-02-07 14:46   ` Qu Wenruo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e73f1311-6f60-ef51-dff1-eda03061df70@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ralphgauges@googlemail.com \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox