From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: "Emil.s" <emil@sandnabba.se>
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Force remove of broken extent/subvolume? (Crash in btrfs_run_delayed_refs)
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 10:12:35 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e91b02e2-4a90-4bbf-ad49-44f855220013@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEA9r7AzYtQ9BifUPcW3=1zz=RmS9Fb3CnProGMg6GVkmd14TQ@mail.gmail.com>
在 2024/7/26 20:22, Emil.s 写道:
>> As for any bitflip induced errors, it's hard to tell how far it got
>> propagated, this could be the only instance or there could be other
>> items referring to that one too.
>
> Right, yeah that sounds a bit more challenging then I initially thought.
> Maybe it is easier to just rebuild the array after all.
>
> And in regards to Qu's question, that is probably a good idea anyhow.
>
>> - History of the fs
>> - The hardware spec
>
> This has been my personal NAS / home server for quite some time.
> It's basically a mix of just leftover desktop hardware (without ECC memory).
>
> It was a 12 year old Gigabyte H77-D3H motherboard, an Intel i7-2600 CPU
> and 4 DDR3 DIMMs, all of different types and brands.
> The disks are WD red series, and I see now that one of them has over
> 80k power on hours.
I wasn't expecting this, as the normal "memory chip seldom dies" mostly
applies to a much smaller time span, like around 5 years.
>
> I know I did a rebuild about 5 years ago so the FS was probably
> created using Ubuntu server 18.04 (Linux 4.15), which has been
> upgraded to the major LTS versions since then.
And I believe this is where the corruption happened, before any
tree-checker was even introduced.
Thus we didn't catch it early enough and wrote the corrupted data onto
the disk.
> I actually hit this error when I was doing the "final backup" before
> retiring this setup, and it seems it was about time! (Was running
> Ubuntu 22.04 / Linux 5.15)
Thankfully that specific corruption is only on extent tree, you should
still be able to do the backup with it mounted RO, or with "rescue=all"
to be extra safe.
Thanks,
Qu
>
> The Arch setup on the Thinkstation is my workstation where I attempted
> the data recovery.
>
> So due to the legacy hardware and crappy setup I think it's worth
> wasting more time here.
>
> But thanks a lot for the detailed answer, much appreciated!
>
> Best,
> Emil
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 01:19, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-27 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-25 21:06 Force remove of broken extent/subvolume? (Crash in btrfs_run_delayed_refs) Emil.s
2024-07-25 22:47 ` David Sterba
2024-07-25 23:19 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-07-26 10:52 ` Emil.s
2024-07-27 0:42 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2024-07-28 16:09 ` Yuwei Han
2024-08-05 8:16 ` Emil.s
2024-08-05 8:59 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-08-10 18:39 ` Emil.s
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e91b02e2-4a90-4bbf-ad49-44f855220013@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=emil@sandnabba.se \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox