From: Dhruva G <goledhruva@gmail.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Anand Jain <asj@kernel.org>, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>,
Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: exercise NOCOMPRESS range and EOF handling
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 23:38:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea99086d-94ea-4b44-a2f2-076047fb22d4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2920bc87-3d1e-4bfa-99cc-8b4af37fec5e@suse.com>
On 12-10-2026 03:30, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> 在 2026/10/12 06:10, Dhruva G 写道:
>> Check that a bounded --nocomp request rewrites compressed extents in the
>> selected range while distant untouched regions still point to their
>> original compressed storage.
>> Cover a partial final sector, zero length, a length extending past EOF,
>> start at EOF, and the empty-file no-op. Preserve contents and sizes across
>> the conversion and a remount.
>>
>> Add shared FIEMAP and integrity helpers for the NOCOMPRESS tests. Require
>> full mapping coverage and inspect every overlapping extent so holes and
>> partly converted ranges cannot pass. Include a small ioctl helper to
>> probe kernel support and check errno without btrfs-progs translation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dhruva Gole <goledhruva@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> .gitignore | 1 +
>> common/btrfs_nocomp | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> src/Makefile | 2 +-
>> src/btrfs_defrag_nocomp.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++
>> tests/btrfs/355 | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> tests/btrfs/355.out | 2 +
>> 6 files changed, 281 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 common/btrfs_nocomp
>> create mode 100644 src/btrfs_defrag_nocomp.c
>> create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/355
>> create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/355.out
>>
>> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
>> index 0b6b9452..1bfa12ef 100644
>> --- a/.gitignore
>> +++ b/.gitignore
>> @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ tags
>> /src/truncate
>> /src/t_btrfs_received_uuid_ioctl
>> /src/btrfs_ioctl
>> +/src/btrfs_defrag_nocomp
>>
>> # Symlinked files
>> /tests/generic/035.out
>> diff --git a/common/btrfs_nocomp b/common/btrfs_nocomp
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000..7e2111e1
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/common/btrfs_nocomp
>> @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +# Copyright (c) Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates.
>> +# Helpers for BTRFS_DEFRAG_RANGE_NOCOMPRESS tests.
>
> I don't like a dedicated file just do all those.
> Why not put them into common/btrfs?
>
>> +
>> +_nc_require()
>
> And "nc" is too generic, _require_btrfs_defrag_nocompress() would make
> more sense.
>
> All the namings here look just some temporary scaffolding, not for
> generic purposes.
Agreed. I'll move the shared helpers into common/btrfs and use more descriptive names in v2.
>
>> +{
>> + _require_scratch
>> + _require_test_program btrfs_defrag_nocomp
>> + _require_xfs_io_command fiemap ranged
>> + _require_btrfs_command filesystem defragment --nocomp
>> + _require_btrfs_no_nodatacow
>> + _require_btrfs_no_nodatasum
>> + _require_btrfs_no_autodefrag
>> + _require_btrfs_support_sectorsize 4096
>> + _wants_kernel_commit 009b2056cb25 \
>> + "btrfs: defrag: add flag to force no-compression"
>> +}
>> +
>> +_nc_write()
>> +{
>> + $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S $4 -b 128K $2 $3" -c fsync "$1" \
>> + >> "$seqres.full" 2>&1 || _fail "write failed: $1"
>> +}
>> +
>> +_nc_probe()
>> +{
>> + local result
>> +
>> + _nc_write "$SCRATCH_MNT/probe" 0 131072 0x5a
>> + result=$($here/src/btrfs_defrag_nocomp "$SCRATCH_MNT/probe" 0 131072) ||
>> + _fail "NOCOMPRESS probe failed"
>
> Why we need such dedicated probe program while the kernel is already
> rejecting unknown flags with ENOTTY?
>
> And I think this probing should also be done inside the
> _require_btrfs_defrag_nocompress().
Agreed. I'll do this in v2.
>
>> + case "$result" in
>> + OK) ;;
>> + EOPNOTSUPP|ENOTTY) _notrun "kernel does not support NOCOMPRESS" ;;
>> + *) _fail "unexpected NOCOMPRESS probe result: $result" ;;
>> + esac
>> + rm -f "$SCRATCH_MNT/probe"
>> +}
>> +
>> +_nc_defrag()
>> +{
>> + local file="${@: -1}"
>> +
>> + $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem defragment --nocomp "$@" \
>> + >> "$seqres.full" 2>&1 || _fail "NOCOMPRESS defrag failed"
>> + $XFS_IO_PROG -c fsync "$file" >> "$seqres.full" 2>&1 ||
>> + _fail "fsync after defrag failed"
>> +}
>> +
>> +_nc_map()
>> +{
>> + $XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v $2 $3" "$1" > "$tmp.nc-map" \
>> + 2>> "$seqres.full" || _fail "fiemap failed: $1"
>> + cat "$tmp.nc-map" >> "$seqres.full"
>> +}
>> +
>> +# FIEMAP prints logical offsets in 512-byte units. Check every overlapping
>> +# extent and complete coverage, so a hole or a partly converted range fails.
>> +# The caller supplies byte offsets and lengths, including a partial EOF sector.
>> +_nc_check_range()
>
> This looks a little overkilled to me.
> > For regular hole/compression flags, what about filtering out the
> non-hole logical bytenr (e.g. replace them with 'XXX' or 'regular'),
> then output to the stdout, and use golden output to verify?
For patch 3, the test also needs to distinguish compressed inline extents from compressed non-inline extents.
_filter_fiemap_flags 1 retains the encoded flag, but currently filters out the inline flag.
Would you prefer a small opt-in extension to retain the inline flag, or a test-local filter?
With the extension, existing callers would retain their current output, and the inline test could use:
_filter_fiemap_flags 1 1.
Thanks for reviewing and suggestions!
Regards,
Dhruva Gole
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1791395660.git.goledhruva@gmail.com>
2026-10-11 19:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: exercise NOCOMPRESS range and EOF handling Dhruva G
2026-10-11 22:00 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-10-13 18:08 ` Dhruva G [this message]
2026-10-12 11:04 ` Filipe Manana
2026-10-11 19:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: check NOCOMPRESS preserves holes and preallocation Dhruva G
2026-10-11 19:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: cover NOCOMPRESS inline eligibility and short tails Dhruva G
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea99086d-94ea-4b44-a2f2-076047fb22d4@gmail.com \
--to=goledhruva@gmail.com \
--cc=asj@kernel.org \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox