From: Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com>
To: Zoltán <zoltan1980@gmail.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Disk usage difference in the output of `btrfs fi show` vs. `btrfs fi du`
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 20:19:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb075afb-e9ca-5783-f8a2-1bd6b1192dd7@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGtRCvfHfjFFZZQCEHR+ff-JfNCCOMq=B0PxaCc-_+a6XKEg+A@mail.gmail.com>
On 28.03.2021 15:28, Zoltán wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have read a lot of caveats about interpreting the free space
> reported for btrfs volumes, but could not find anything about the
> perceived inconsistency in the disk usage reporting described below.
>
> I have a btrfs volume with about 135GiB used for data, as reported by
> `df`, `btrfs fi show` and `btrfs fi usage` alike:
>
> # btrfs filesystem show /volumes/main/
> Label: 'main' uuid: xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Total devices 1 FS bytes used 134.12GiB
> devid 1 size 193.43GiB used 165.01GiB path /dev/sda2
>
> However, `btrfs fi du` reports ~17GiB exclusive usage and ~80GiB
> shared usage, which adds up to only 97GiB (compared to the 135GiB I
> would expect):
>
> # btrfs filesystem du -s /volumes/main/
> Total Exclusive Set shared Filename
> 1.73TiB 17.20GiB 80.13GiB /volumes/main/
>
> (The reported total usage exceeding the disk capacity by an order of
> magnitude is expected as the volume contains many snapshots.)
>
> The mount point corresponds to the root subvolume, thus all subvolumes
> should be accounted for by `btrfs fi du` (according to its
> documentation):
>
> # mount | grep /volumes/main
> /dev/sda2 on /volumes/main type btrfs
> (rw,noatime,ssd,space_cache,autodefrag,subvolid=5,subvol=/)
>
> Do I misunderstand the meaning of exclusive and shared usage or is
> there some other issue causing this behaviour? I would expect the disk
It probably does not take in account exclusive usage of other
subvolumes, likely snapshots.
> usage reported by `df`, `btrfs fi show` and `btrfs fi usage` to be the
> sum of the exclusive and shared usage reported by `btrfs fi du`.
>
> The output of `btrfs fi usage`, for completeness's sake:
>
> # btrfs filesystem usage /volumes/main/
> Overall:
> Device size: 193.43GiB
> Device allocated: 165.01GiB
> Device unallocated: 28.41GiB
> Device missing: 0.00B
> Used: 134.12GiB
> Free (estimated): 57.00GiB (min: 57.00GiB)
> Data ratio: 1.00
> Metadata ratio: 1.00
> Global reserve: 194.72MiB (used: 0.00B)
>
> Data,single: Size:162.00GiB, Used:133.41GiB (82.35%)
> /dev/sda2 162.00GiB
>
> Metadata,single: Size:3.01GiB, Used:720.88MiB (23.41%)
> /dev/sda2 3.01GiB
>
> System,single: Size:4.00MiB, Used:48.00KiB (1.17%)
> /dev/sda2 4.00MiB
>
> Unallocated:
> /dev/sda2 28.41GiB
>
> Thanks,
>
> Zoltan
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-28 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-28 12:28 Disk usage difference in the output of `btrfs fi show` vs. `btrfs fi du` Zoltán
2021-03-28 17:19 ` Andrei Borzenkov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eb075afb-e9ca-5783-f8a2-1bd6b1192dd7@gmail.com \
--to=arvidjaar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zoltan1980@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).