From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: print-tree: Enehance uuid item print
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:27:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef87c57c-f0f7-aad5-bea2-e000da69c667@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dcdc0d78-77f9-0e5d-f14a-35d1cb954529@suse.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3760 bytes --]
On 2017年10月31日 15:15, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 31.10.2017 06:03, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> For key type BTRFS_UUID_KEY_SUBVOL or BTRFS_UUID_KEY_RECEIVED_SUBVOL the
>> key objectid and key offset are just half of the UUID.
>>
>> However we just print the key as %llu, which is converted from little
>> endian, not byte order for UUID, nor the traditional 36 bytes human
>> readable uuid format.
>>
>> Although true engineer can easily convert it in their brain, but to
>> make it easier for search, output the result UUID using the 36 chars format.
>>
>> Cc: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
>> ---
>> Inspired by UUID related work from Misono.
>> ---
>> print-tree.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/print-tree.c b/print-tree.c
>> index 3c585e31f1fc..687f871db302 100644
>> --- a/print-tree.c
>> +++ b/print-tree.c
>> @@ -803,14 +803,25 @@ void btrfs_print_key(struct btrfs_disk_key *disk_key)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -static void print_uuid_item(struct extent_buffer *l, unsigned long offset,
>> - u32 item_size)
>> +static void print_uuid_item(struct extent_buffer *l, int slot,
>> + unsigned long offset, u32 item_size)
>> {
>> + struct btrfs_key key;
>> + char uuid_str[BTRFS_UUID_UNPARSED_SIZE];
>> + u8 uuid[BTRFS_UUID_SIZE];
>> +
>> + /* Reassemble the uuid from key.objecitd and key.offset */
>> + btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(l, &key, slot);
>> + put_unaligned_le64(key.objectid, uuid);
>> + put_unaligned_le64(key.offset, uuid + sizeof(u64));
>
> I don't think this will work on a BE system. Because
> btrfs_item_key_to_cpu take the LE representation on-disk and turns it
> into a cpu representation which might very well be BE. And then you
> essentially reverse it by using put_unaligned_le64 for x86 it works fine
> due to it being a LE system.
I know this can be tricky, let's assume the following case:
UUID: 0x0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef (byte order, no endian)
Low bit high bit
Key objectid: 0x0123456789abcdef (LE on-disk)
0xefcdab8967452301 (u64) <- CPU key.objectid
Low bit hight bit
key.offset: 0x123456789abcdef (LE on-disk)
0xefcdab8967452301 (u64) <- CPU key.offset
put_unaligned_le64 will convert CPU key.objectid/offset to LE on-disk
again, so we get
Low bit high bit
0x01 23456789abcd ef (LE on-disk)
uuid[0] ... uuid[7]
And that's what we need.
We did the LE->native and native->LE, so the result is not changed at all.
And we just need byte order, so the result is correct.
Just like what kernel did.
Thanks,
Qu
>
>
>> + uuid_unparse(uuid, uuid_str);
>> +
>> if (item_size & (sizeof(u64) - 1)) {
>> printf("btrfs: uuid item with illegal size %lu!\n",
>> (unsigned long)item_size);
>> return;
>> }
>> + printf("\t\tuuid %s\n", uuid_str);
>> while (item_size) {
>> __le64 subvol_id;
>>
>> @@ -1297,7 +1308,7 @@ void btrfs_print_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *eb)
>> break;
>> case BTRFS_UUID_KEY_SUBVOL:
>> case BTRFS_UUID_KEY_RECEIVED_SUBVOL:
>> - print_uuid_item(eb, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(eb, i),
>> + print_uuid_item(eb, i, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(eb, i),
>> btrfs_item_size_nr(eb, i));
>> break;
>> case BTRFS_STRING_ITEM_KEY: {
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 520 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-31 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-31 4:03 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: print-tree: Enehance uuid item print Qu Wenruo
2017-10-31 5:44 ` Misono, Tomohiro
2017-10-31 7:15 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-10-31 7:27 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2017-10-31 7:29 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-10-31 7:35 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-10-31 7:41 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-10-31 8:05 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ef87c57c-f0f7-aad5-bea2-e000da69c667@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).