linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: print-tree: Enehance uuid item print
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:27:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef87c57c-f0f7-aad5-bea2-e000da69c667@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dcdc0d78-77f9-0e5d-f14a-35d1cb954529@suse.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3760 bytes --]



On 2017年10月31日 15:15, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> 
> 
> On 31.10.2017 06:03, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> For key type BTRFS_UUID_KEY_SUBVOL or BTRFS_UUID_KEY_RECEIVED_SUBVOL the
>> key objectid and key offset are just half of the UUID.
>>
>> However we just print the key as %llu, which is converted from little
>> endian, not byte order for UUID, nor the traditional 36 bytes human
>> readable uuid format.
>>
>> Although true engineer can easily convert it in their brain, but to
>> make it easier for search, output the result UUID using the 36 chars format.
>>
>> Cc: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
>> ---
>> Inspired by UUID related work from Misono.
>> ---
>>  print-tree.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/print-tree.c b/print-tree.c
>> index 3c585e31f1fc..687f871db302 100644
>> --- a/print-tree.c
>> +++ b/print-tree.c
>> @@ -803,14 +803,25 @@ void btrfs_print_key(struct btrfs_disk_key *disk_key)
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> -static void print_uuid_item(struct extent_buffer *l, unsigned long offset,
>> -			    u32 item_size)
>> +static void print_uuid_item(struct extent_buffer *l, int slot,
>> +			    unsigned long offset, u32 item_size)
>>  {
>> +	struct btrfs_key key;
>> +	char uuid_str[BTRFS_UUID_UNPARSED_SIZE];
>> +	u8 uuid[BTRFS_UUID_SIZE];
>> +
>> +	/* Reassemble the uuid from key.objecitd and key.offset */
>> +	btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(l, &key, slot);
>> +	put_unaligned_le64(key.objectid, uuid);
>> +	put_unaligned_le64(key.offset, uuid + sizeof(u64));
> 
> I don't think this will work on a BE system. Because
> btrfs_item_key_to_cpu take the LE representation on-disk and turns it
> into a cpu representation which might very well be BE. And then you
> essentially reverse it by using put_unaligned_le64 for x86 it works fine
> due to it being a LE system.

I know this can be tricky, let's assume the following case:

UUID: 0x0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef (byte order, no endian)
              Low bit          high bit
Key objectid: 0x0123456789abcdef (LE on-disk)

              0xefcdab8967452301 (u64)  <- CPU key.objectid

              Low bit         hight bit
key.offset:   0x123456789abcdef (LE on-disk)
              0xefcdab8967452301 (u64)  <- CPU key.offset

put_unaligned_le64 will convert CPU key.objectid/offset to LE on-disk
again, so we get
              Low bit                  high bit
              0x01    23456789abcd     ef (LE on-disk)
              uuid[0]      ...         uuid[7]

And that's what we need.

We did the LE->native and native->LE, so the result is not changed at all.
And we just need byte order, so the result is correct.

Just like what kernel did.

Thanks,
Qu
> 
> 
>> +	uuid_unparse(uuid, uuid_str);
>> +
>>  	if (item_size & (sizeof(u64) - 1)) {
>>  		printf("btrfs: uuid item with illegal size %lu!\n",
>>  		       (unsigned long)item_size);
>>  		return;
>>  	}
>> +	printf("\t\tuuid %s\n", uuid_str);
>>  	while (item_size) {
>>  		__le64 subvol_id;
>>  
>> @@ -1297,7 +1308,7 @@ void btrfs_print_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *eb)
>>  			break;
>>  		case BTRFS_UUID_KEY_SUBVOL:
>>  		case BTRFS_UUID_KEY_RECEIVED_SUBVOL:
>> -			print_uuid_item(eb, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(eb, i),
>> +			print_uuid_item(eb, i, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(eb, i),
>>  					btrfs_item_size_nr(eb, i));
>>  			break;
>>  		case BTRFS_STRING_ITEM_KEY: {
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 520 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-31  7:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-31  4:03 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: print-tree: Enehance uuid item print Qu Wenruo
2017-10-31  5:44 ` Misono, Tomohiro
2017-10-31  7:15 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-10-31  7:27   ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2017-10-31  7:29   ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-10-31  7:35     ` Qu Wenruo
2017-10-31  7:41       ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-10-31  8:05         ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ef87c57c-f0f7-aad5-bea2-e000da69c667@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).