linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* is send/receive
@ 2017-04-01 15:25 Lukas Tribus
  2017-04-01 16:29 ` Hugo Mills
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lukas Tribus @ 2017-04-01 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux fs Btrfs

Hello experts,


quick question about btrfs send/receive:

Is btrfs send/receive is prone to cause destination filesystem 
corruption/failure, when the source file system is bogus (due to bugs, 
or due to other factors like memory bit-flips happening, both *within* 
the source file system)?

Or asked differently: does send/receive transfer metadata/tree (which 
may be corrupt) from source to destination?


I would like to know if send/receive is a *completely* appropriate to 
backup data to a destination btrfs filesystem, or if there is a - even a 
one in a million - chance it may corrupt the destination FS. Would it be 
preferable to use a non-btrfs destination FS for backup purposes? What 
do you guys think?


Also, if I understand correctly, checksum are not transferred through 
send/receive, therefor a corruption while transferring is possible (just 
like with rsync), right?



Thanks,

Lukas




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-04-01 16:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-04-01 15:25 is send/receive Lukas Tribus
2017-04-01 16:29 ` Hugo Mills

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).