From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: Direct IO page bouncing got some garbage?
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 14:54:22 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f1dbdcd6-4e6e-4304-8fa5-59c2c60252ad@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b866b2e6-292f-4c5e-ae5a-d77e983cfefd@suse.com>
在 2026/6/12 11:11, Qu Wenruo 写道:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I'm trying to make btrfs utilize IOMAP_DIO_BOUNCE, however I'm
> experiencing weird data corruption.
>
> During test case generic/708, I'm reliably hitting garbage pages at the
> last 64KiB, the garbage even contains an ELF header.
Added ftrace shows that, since btrfs has to disable page fault to avoid
certain deadlock, bio_iov_iter_bounced() failed with a short copy.
Initially bio_iov_iter_bounced() got a 1MiB page, but copy_iter_from()
only copied 64K then failed due to the disabled page fault.
I don't think it's a coincident that the short 64K exactly matches where
the garbage is (the last 64K).
I guess it's in the error path we didn't properly revert the iov iter?
>
> In that test case, we mmap a 2MiB sized buffer from another file, and
> use that 2MiB mmapped memory as buffer for direct IO, write into a
> different file.
>
> The source file has dirty page cache for that 2MiB range, and no
> writeback happened during that direct IO write.
>
> So it means as long as we fault in all the pages of that 2MiB buffer, we
> should be able to copy them into the newly allocated folio, and submit a
> bio using the bounced pages.
>
> But the last 64KiB is reliably corrupted with some ELF header.
>
> I'm wondering where the corruption is from, especially it seems btrfs
> has very little to do, except calling fault_in_iov_readable() to fault
> in all the pages.
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-12 5:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 1:41 Direct IO page bouncing got some garbage? Qu Wenruo
2026-06-12 5:24 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2026-06-12 8:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-12 8:27 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f1dbdcd6-4e6e-4304-8fa5-59c2c60252ad@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox