From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, Neal Gompa <neal@gompa.dev>
Cc: Linux BTRFS Development <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>,
Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>, Sven Peter <sven@svenpeter.dev>,
Davide Cavalca <davide@cavalca.name>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
Asahi Lina <lina@asahilina.net>,
Asahi Linux <asahi@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] Enforce 4k sectorize by default for mkfs
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 06:27:26 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f229058e-4f5d-4bd0-9016-41b133688443@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fb78d997-cb99-4b98-8042-bdcdbff22b88@marcan.st>
On 2023/11/29 01:31, Hector Martin wrote:
>
>
> On 2023/11/28 1:07, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 11:02:23AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>> The Fedora Asahi SIG[0] is working on bringing up support for
>>> Apple Silicon Macintosh computers through the Fedora Asahi Remix[1].
>>>
>>> Apple Silicon Macs are unusual in that they currently require 16k
>>> page sizes, which means that the current default for mkfs.btrfs(8)
>>> makes a filesystem that is unreadable on x86 PCs and most other ARM
>>> PCs.
>>>
>>> This is now even more of a problem within Apple Silicon Macs as it is now
>>> possible to nest 4K Fedora Linux VMs on 16K Fedora Asahi Remix machines to
>>> enable performant x86 emulation[2] and the host storage needs to be compatible
>>> for both environments.
>>>
>>> Thus, I'd like to see us finally make the switchover to 4k sectorsize
>>> for new filesystems by default, regardless of page size.
>>>
>>> The initial test run by Hector Martin[3] at request of Qu Wenruo
>>> looked promising[4], and we've been running with this behavior on
>>> Fedora Linux since Fedora Linux 36 (at around 6.2) with no issues.
>>>
>>
>> This is a good change and well documented. This isn't being ignored, it's just
>> a policy change that we have to be conservative about considering. We only in
>> the last 3 months have added a Apple Silicon machine to our testing
>> infrastructure (running Fedora Asahi fwiw) to make sure we're getting consistent
>> subpage-blocksize testing. Generally speaking it's been fine, we've fixed a few
>> things and haven't broken anything, but it's still comes with some risks when
>> compared to the default of using the pagesize.
>>
>> We will continue to discuss this amongst ourselves and figure out what we think
>> would be a reasonable timeframe to make this switch and let you know what we're
>> thinking ASAP. Thanks,
>
> Reminder that the Raspberry Pi 5 is also shipping with 16K pages by
> default now. The clock is ticking for an ever-growing stream of people
> upset that they can't mount/data-rescue/etc their rPi5 NAS disks from an
> x86 machine ;)
As long as they are using 5.15+ kernel, they should be able to mount and
use their RPI NAS with disks from x86 machines.
The change is only for the default mkfs options.
Thanks,
Qu
>
> - Hector
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-28 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-16 16:02 [PATCH v4 0/1] Enforce 4k sectorize by default for mkfs Neal Gompa
2023-11-16 16:02 ` [PATCH v4 1/1] btrfs-progs: mkfs: Enforce 4k sectorsize by default Neal Gompa
2023-11-17 10:41 ` Eric Curtin
2023-11-27 16:07 ` [PATCH v4 0/1] Enforce 4k sectorize by default for mkfs Josef Bacik
2023-11-28 15:01 ` Hector Martin
2023-11-28 19:57 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2023-11-28 20:09 ` Roman Mamedov
2023-11-28 20:31 ` Qu Wenruo
2023-11-28 21:24 ` Neal Gompa
2023-11-29 12:58 ` Hector Martin
2023-11-29 20:27 ` Qu Wenruo
2023-11-30 3:38 ` Neal Gompa
2023-12-13 22:25 ` David Sterba
2024-01-05 23:10 ` Neal Gompa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f229058e-4f5d-4bd0-9016-41b133688443@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=asahi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=davide@cavalca.name \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=lina@asahilina.net \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcan@marcan.st \
--cc=neal@gompa.dev \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=sven@svenpeter.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox