From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, djwong@kernel.org, zlang@kernel.org,
fdmanana@kernel.org, quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] btrfs/301: Make the test compatible with all the supported block sizes
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 07:29:07 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f257edaa-b7aa-4076-bb7c-a2f3dc7549fa@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <122da7535db9470515980b765ebbd05f6dd7d882.1755604735.git.nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
在 2025/8/19 21:30, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) 写道:
> With large block sizes like 64k the test failed with the
> following logs:
>
> QA output created by 301
> basic accounting
> +subvol 256 mismatched usage 33947648 vs 4587520 (expected data 4194304 expected meta 393216 diff 29360128)
> +subvol 256 mismatched usage 168165376 vs 138805248 (expected data 138412032 expected meta 393216 diff 29360128)
> +subvol 256 mismatched usage 33947648 vs 4587520 (expected data 4194304 expected meta 393216 diff 29360128)
> +subvol 256 mismatched usage 33947648 vs 4587520 (expected data 4194304 expected meta 393216 diff 29360128)
> fallocate: Disk quota exceeded
>
> The test creates nr_fill files each of size 8k. Now with 64k
> block size, 8k sized files occupy more than the expected sizes (i.e, 8k)
> due to internal fragmentation, since 1 file will occupy at least 1
> fsblock. Fix this by making the file size 64k, which is aligned
> with all the supported block sizes.
>
> Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Thanks,
Qu
> ---
> tests/btrfs/301 | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/301 b/tests/btrfs/301
> index 6b59749d..be346f52 100755
> --- a/tests/btrfs/301
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/301
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ subv=$SCRATCH_MNT/subv
> nested=$SCRATCH_MNT/subv/nested
> snap=$SCRATCH_MNT/snap
> nr_fill=512
> -fill_sz=$((8 * 1024))
> +fill_sz=$((64 * 1024))
> total_fill=$(($nr_fill * $fill_sz))
> nodesize=$($BTRFS_UTIL_PROG inspect-internal dump-super $SCRATCH_DEV | \
> grep nodesize | $AWK_PROG '{print $2}')
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-19 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-19 12:00 [PATCH v2 0/4] btrfs: Misc test fixes for large block/node sizes Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-19 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] btrfs/301: Make the test compatible with all the supported block sizes Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-19 21:59 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2025-08-19 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] generic/274: Make the pwrite block sizes and offsets to 64k Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-19 22:09 ` Qu Wenruo
2025-08-20 4:36 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-19 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] btrfs/137: Make this test compatible with all supported block sizes Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-19 22:10 ` Qu Wenruo
2025-08-19 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] generic/563: Increase the iosize to to cover for btrfs Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-19 22:29 ` Qu Wenruo
2025-08-20 5:00 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-20 5:45 ` Qu Wenruo
2025-08-20 8:00 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f257edaa-b7aa-4076-bb7c-a2f3dc7549fa@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox