From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dsterba@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs-progs: ctree: Add extra level check for read_node_slot()
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 10:09:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3a7a7a3-1fbb-714a-e857-00d606310b95@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180209074428.29187-2-wqu@suse.com>
On 9.02.2018 09:44, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Strangely, we have level check in btrfs_print_tree() while we don't have
> the same check in read_node_slot().
>
> That's to say, for the following corruption, btrfs_search_slot() or
> btrfs_next_leaf() can return invalid leaf:
>
> Parent eb:
> node XXXXXX level 1
> ^^^^^^^
> Child should be leaf (level 0)
> ...
> key (XXX XXX XXX) block YYYYYY
>
> Child eb:
> leaf YYYYYY level 1
> ^^^^^^^
> Something went wrong now
>
> And for the corrupted leaf returned, later caller can be screwed up
> easily.
>
> Although the root cause (powerloss, but still something wrong breaking
> metadata CoW of btrfs) is still unknown, at least enhance btrfs-progs to
> avoid SEGV.
>
> Reported-by: Ralph Gauges <ralphgauges@googlemail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> ---
> changlog:
> v2:
> Check if the extent buffer is up-to-date before checking its level to
> avoid possible NULL pointer access.
> ---
> ctree.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
That was sent separately so I'd assume it was in the wrong dir ;)
>
> diff --git a/ctree.c b/ctree.c
> index 4fc33b14000a..430805e3043f 100644
> --- a/ctree.c
> +++ b/ctree.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include "repair.h"
> #include "internal.h"
> #include "sizes.h"
> +#include "messages.h"
>
> static int split_node(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root
> *root, struct btrfs_path *path, int level);
> @@ -640,7 +641,9 @@ static int bin_search(struct extent_buffer *eb, struct btrfs_key *key,
> struct extent_buffer *read_node_slot(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> struct extent_buffer *parent, int slot)
> {
> + struct extent_buffer *ret;
> int level = btrfs_header_level(parent);
> +
> if (slot < 0)
> return NULL;
> if (slot >= btrfs_header_nritems(parent))
> @@ -649,8 +652,19 @@ struct extent_buffer *read_node_slot(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> if (level == 0)
> return NULL;
>
> - return read_tree_block(fs_info, btrfs_node_blockptr(parent, slot),
> + ret = read_tree_block(fs_info, btrfs_node_blockptr(parent, slot),
> btrfs_node_ptr_generation(parent, slot));
> + if (!extent_buffer_uptodate(ret))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
> +
> + if (btrfs_header_level(ret) != level - 1) {
> + error("child eb corrupted: parent bytenr=%llu item=%d parent level=%d child level=%d",
> + btrfs_header_bytenr(parent), slot,
> + btrfs_header_level(parent), btrfs_header_level(ret));
> + free_extent_buffer(ret);
> + return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
> + }
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int balance_level(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-09 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-09 7:44 [PATCH v2 00/10] Chunk allocator unification Qu Wenruo
2018-02-09 7:44 ` [PATCH v2] btrfs-progs: ctree: Add extra level check for read_node_slot() Qu Wenruo
2018-02-09 8:09 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2018-02-09 10:02 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-02-09 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] btrfs-progs: Refactor parameter of BTRFS_MAX_DEVS() from root to fs_info Qu Wenruo
2018-02-09 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] btrfs-progs: Merge btrfs_alloc_data_chunk into btrfs_alloc_chunk Qu Wenruo
2018-02-09 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] btrfs-progs: Make btrfs_alloc_chunk to handle block group creation Qu Wenruo
2018-02-09 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] btrfs-progs: Introduce btrfs_raid_array and related infrastructures Qu Wenruo
2018-02-09 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] btrfs-progs: volumes: Allow find_free_dev_extent() to return maximum hole size Qu Wenruo
2018-02-09 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] btrfs-progs: kernel-lib: Port kernel sort() to btrfs-progs Qu Wenruo
2018-02-21 15:40 ` David Sterba
2018-02-22 1:43 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-03-09 18:14 ` David Sterba
2018-02-09 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] btrfs-progs: volumes: Unify free dev extent search behavior between kernel and btrfs-progs Qu Wenruo
2018-02-09 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] btrfs-progs: Move chunk stripe size calcution function to volumes.h Qu Wenruo
2018-02-09 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] btrfs-progs: Use btrfs_device->fs_info to replace btrfs_device->dev_root Qu Wenruo
2018-02-09 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] btrfs-progs: Refactor btrfs_alloc_chunk to mimic kernel structure and behavior Qu Wenruo
2018-02-09 8:17 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-02-09 10:01 ` Qu Wenruo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-02-08 0:59 [PATCH v2] btrfs-progs: ctree: Add extra level check for read_node_slot() Qu Wenruo
2018-02-08 7:38 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-03-19 12:36 ` David Sterba
2018-03-20 5:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-03-20 5:23 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f3a7a7a3-1fbb-714a-e857-00d606310b95@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).