Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, dsterba@suse.cz
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 16:27:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f45f036b-72df-1ec6-ac32-4a2b98be5b3a@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5fafa142-7995-4603-a6b2-8360dda8e7fb@suse.com>



On 18/08/2023 08:21, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023/8/18 01:19, Anand Jain wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 17/8/23 20:04, David Sterba wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 08:30:40PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>>>> The BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag indicates a transient state
>>>> where the device in the userspace btrfstune -m|-M operation failed to
>>>> complete changing the fsid.
>>>>
>>>> This flag makes the kernel to automatically determine the other
>>>> partner devices to which a given device can be associated, based on the
>>>> fsid, metadata_uuid and generation values.
>>>>
>>>> btrfstune -m|M feature is especially useful in virtual cloud setups, 
>>>> where
>>>> compute instances (disk images) are quickly copied, fsid changed, and
>>>> launched. Given numerous disk images with the same metadata_uuid but
>>>> different fsid, there's no clear way a device can be correctly 
>>>> assembled
>>>> with the proper partners when the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag is set. So, the
>>>> disk could be assembled incorrectly, as in the example below:
>>>>
>>>> Before this patch:
>>>>
>>>> Consider the following two filesystems:
>>>>     /dev/loop[2-3] are raw copies of /dev/loop[0-1] and the 
>>>> btrsftune -m
>>>> operation fails.
>>>>
>>>> In this scenario, as the /dev/loop0's fsid change is interrupted, 
>>>> and the
>>>> CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag is set as shown below.
>>>>
>>>>    $ p="device|devid|^metadata_uuid|^fsid|^incom|^generation|^flags"
>>>>
>>>>    $ btrfs inspect dump-super /dev/loop0 | egrep '$p'
>>>>    superblock: bytenr=65536, device=/dev/loop0
>>>>    flags            0x1000000001
>>>>    fsid            7d4b4b93-2b27-4432-b4e4-4be1fbccbd45
>>>>    metadata_uuid        bb040a9f-233a-4de2-ad84-49aa5a28059b
>>>>    generation        9
>>>>    num_devices        2
>>>>    incompat_flags    0x741
>>>>    dev_item.devid    1
>>>>
>>>>    $ btrfs inspect dump-super /dev/loop1 | egrep '$p'
>>>>    superblock: bytenr=65536, device=/dev/loop1
>>>>    flags            0x1
>>>>    fsid            11d2af4d-1b71-45a9-83f6-f2100766939d
>>>>    metadata_uuid        bb040a9f-233a-4de2-ad84-49aa5a28059b
>>>>    generation        10
>>>>    num_devices        2
>>>>    incompat_flags    0x741
>>>>    dev_item.devid    2
>>>>
>>>>    $ btrfs inspect dump-super /dev/loop2 | egrep '$p'
>>>>    superblock: bytenr=65536, device=/dev/loop2
>>>>    flags            0x1
>>>>    fsid            7d4b4b93-2b27-4432-b4e4-4be1fbccbd45
>>>>    metadata_uuid        bb040a9f-233a-4de2-ad84-49aa5a28059b
>>>>    generation        8
>>>>    num_devices        2
>>>>    incompat_flags    0x741
>>>>    dev_item.devid    1
>>>>
>>>>    $ btrfs inspect dump-super /dev/loop3 | egrep '$p'
>>>>    superblock: bytenr=65536, device=/dev/loop3
>>>>    flags            0x1
>>>>    fsid            7d4b4b93-2b27-4432-b4e4-4be1fbccbd45
>>>>    metadata_uuid        bb040a9f-233a-4de2-ad84-49aa5a28059b
>>>>    generation        8
>>>>    num_devices        2
>>>>    incompat_flags    0x741
>>>>    dev_item.devid    2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It is normal that some devices aren't instantly discovered during
>>>> system boot or iSCSI discovery. The controlled scan below demonstrates
>>>> this.
>>>>
>>>>    $ btrfs device scan --forget
>>>>    $ btrfs device scan /dev/loop0
>>>>    Scanning for btrfs filesystems on '/dev/loop0'
>>>>    $ mount /dev/loop3 /btrfs
>>>>    $ btrfs filesystem show -m
>>>>    Label: none  uuid: 7d4b4b93-2b27-4432-b4e4-4be1fbccbd45
>>>>     Total devices 2 FS bytes used 144.00KiB
>>>>     devid    1 size 300.00MiB used 48.00MiB path /dev/loop0
>>>>     devid    2 size 300.00MiB used 40.00MiB path /dev/loop3
>>>>
>>>> /dev/loop0 and /dev/loop3 are incorrectly partnered.
>>>>
>>>> This kernel patch removes functions and code connected to the
>>>> CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag.
>>>
>>> I didn't have a closer look but it seems you're removing all the logic
>>> to make the metadata uuid robust and usable in case of interrupted
>>> conversion, while finding another case where it does not work as you
>>> expect. With this it would be change in behaviour, we need to check
>>> the original use case. IIRC as the metadata uuid change is lightweight
>>> we want to try harder to deal with the easy errors instead of rejecting
>>> the filesystem mount.
>>
>> Robust indeed. Silently assembling wrong devices-data loss risk?
>> Failing to assemble is still safe.
>>
>> I think it is better to introduce a sub-command to clone btrfs
>> filesystem with a new device-uuid and same fsid (as it looks like
>> same fsid has some use case).
>>
>> Thanks, Anand
> 
> Oh, my memory comes back, the original design for the two stage 
> commitment is to avoid split brain cases when one device is committed 
> with the new flag, while the remaining one doesn't.
> 
> With the extra stage, even if at stage 1 or 2 the transaction is 
> interrupted and only one device got the new flag, it can help us to 
> locate the stage and recover.

As this comment is about the btrfstune patch

  [PATCH RFC] btrfs-progs: btrfstune -m|M remove 2-stage commit

Let's discuss it there.

Thanks.



  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-18  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-16 12:30 [PATCH] btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2 Anand Jain
2023-08-17 12:04 ` David Sterba
2023-08-17 17:19   ` Anand Jain
2023-08-18  0:21     ` Qu Wenruo
2023-08-18  8:27       ` Anand Jain [this message]
2023-09-18 22:44 ` David Sterba
2023-09-19 11:40   ` Anand Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f45f036b-72df-1ec6-ac32-4a2b98be5b3a@oracle.com \
    --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox