From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] btrfs: pick device with lowest devt for show_devname
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 06:55:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5a58903-b6c8-4cfd-9328-ea8214ca3399@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231102202652.GK11264@twin.jikos.cz>
On 11/3/23 04:26, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 07:10:48PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>> In a non-single-device Btrfs filesystem, if Btrfs is already mounted and
>> if you run the command 'mount -a,' it will fail and the command
>> 'umount <device>' also fails. As below:
>>
>> ----------------
>> $ cat /etc/fstab | grep btrfs
>> UUID=12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc /btrfs btrfs defaults,nofail 0 0
>>
>> $ mkfs.btrfs -qf --uuid 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc /dev/sda2 /dev/sda1
>> $ mount --verbose -a
>> / : ignored
>> /btrfs : successfully mounted
>>
>> $ ls -l /dev/disk/by-uuid | grep 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Nov 2 17:43 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc -> ../../sda1
>>
>> $ cat /proc/self/mounts | grep btrfs
>> /dev/sda2 /btrfs btrfs rw,relatime,space_cache=v2,subvolid=5,subvol=/ 0 0
>>
>> $ findmnt --df /btrfs
>> SOURCE FSTYPE SIZE USED AVAIL USE% TARGET
>> /dev/sda2 btrfs 2G 5.8M 1.8G 0% /btrfs
>>
>> $ mount --verbose -a
>> / : ignored
>> mount: /btrfs: /dev/sda1 already mounted or mount point busy.
>> $echo $?
>> 32
>>
>> $ umount /dev/sda1
>> umount: /dev/sda1: not mounted.
>> $ echo $?
>> 32
>> ----------------
>>
>> I assume (RFC) this is because '/dev/disk/by-uuid,' '/proc/self/mounts,'
>> and 'findmnt' do not all reference the same device, resulting in the
>> 'mount -a' and 'umount' failures. However, an empirically found solution
>> is to align them using a rule, such as the disk with the lowest 'devt,'
>> for a multi-device Btrfs filesystem.
>>
>> I'm not yet sure (RFC) how to create a udev rule to point to the disk with
>> the lowest 'devt,' as this kernel patch does, and I believe it is
>> possible.
>>
>> And this would ensure that '/proc/self/mounts,' 'findmnt,' and
>> '/dev/disk/by-uuid' all reference the same device.
>>
>> After applying this patch, the above test passes. Unfortunately,
>> /dev/disk/by-uuid also points to the lowest 'devt' by chance, even though
>> no rule has been set as of now. As shown below.
>
> Does this mean the devid of the device shown in /proc/self/mount won't
> be the lowest? Here the devid is the logical device number, while devt
> is some internal identifier or at least not something I'd consider a
> good identifier from user perspective.
>
> The lowest devid has been there for a long time so I'd consider this as
> behaviour change which can potentially break things.
It's not the lowest devid, but rather the latest_bdev since commit
6605fd2f394b ('btrfs: use latest_dev in btrfs_show_devname').
We need a rule for choosing a device in a multi-device filesystem that
works both inside and outside the kernel. The major-minor (devt) is the
only consistent option.
OR Any other ideas?
Thanks, Anand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-02 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-02 11:10 [PATCH RFC] btrfs: pick device with lowest devt for show_devname Anand Jain
2023-11-02 20:26 ` David Sterba
2023-11-02 22:55 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2023-11-20 14:42 ` David Sterba
2023-11-24 16:19 ` David Sterba
2023-11-25 1:09 ` Anand Jain
2023-11-27 11:48 ` Anand Jain
2023-11-28 8:00 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2023-11-28 23:28 ` Anand Jain
2023-11-29 13:38 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2023-11-29 20:54 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2023-12-05 17:44 ` David Sterba
2023-12-06 19:52 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2023-12-05 17:43 ` David Sterba
2023-11-29 21:20 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f5a58903-b6c8-4cfd-9328-ea8214ca3399@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox