From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: "Flint.Wang" <hmsjwzb@zoho.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, anand.jain@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs-progs: chunk tree search solution for btrfs249
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 14:24:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8043322-7a70-80ac-4a19-3945df839d9b@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220815024341.4677-1-hmsjwzb@zoho.com>
On 2022/8/15 10:43, Flint.Wang wrote:
> Hi Qu,
>
> Thanks for your comment. I fix the issue you suggest.
> It is much clean now.
>
> Btrfs249 failed due to btrfs_ioctl_fs_info() return RW devices for fi_args->num_devices.
> This patch search chunk tree to find rw devices.
>
> v2 change:
> 1. code style fix.
> 2. noseed_dev => rw_devs, noseed_fsid => fsid.
> 3. remove redundant structure devid_uuid.
> 4. reuse the dev_info structure.
> 5. remove redundant uuid argument.
>
> Signed-off-by: Flint.Wang <hmsjwzb@zoho.com>
Any update on this patch? IIRC btrfs/249 still fails without this patch.
Although Anand Jain has a similar patchset, but his solution requires a
new kernel sysfs, which can still cause compatibility problems.
Thus your patch is still the better one, but your commit message still
needs some update.
Thanks,
Qu
> ---
> cmds/filesystem-usage.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cmds/filesystem-usage.c b/cmds/filesystem-usage.c
> index 01729e18..71f0e14c 100644
> --- a/cmds/filesystem-usage.c
> +++ b/cmds/filesystem-usage.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> #include <getopt.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <linux/limits.h>
> +#include <uuid/uuid.h>
>
> #include "common/utils.h"
> #include "kerncompat.h"
> @@ -689,6 +690,62 @@ out:
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int load_devid(int fd, struct device_info *info,
> + int ndev, u8 *fsid)
> +{
> + struct btrfs_ioctl_search_args_v2 *args2;
> + struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key *sk;
> + struct btrfs_ioctl_search_header *sh;
> + struct btrfs_dev_item *dev_item;
> + int args2_size = 1024;
> + char args2_buf[args2_size];
> + int ret = 0;
> + int i = 0;
> + int num = 0;
> + int rw_devs = 0;
> + int idx = 0;
> +
> + args2 = (struct btrfs_ioctl_search_args_v2 *) args2_buf;
> + sk = &(args2->key);
> +
> + sk->tree_id = BTRFS_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID;
> + sk->min_objectid = BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID;
> + sk->max_objectid = BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID;
> + sk->min_type = BTRFS_DEV_ITEM_KEY;
> + sk->max_type = BTRFS_DEV_ITEM_KEY;
> + sk->min_offset = 0;
> + sk->max_offset = (u64)-1;
> + sk->min_transid = 0;
> + sk->max_transid = (u64)-1;
> + sk->nr_items = -1;
> + args2->buf_size = args2_size - sizeof(struct btrfs_ioctl_search_args_v2);
> + ret = ioctl(fd, BTRFS_IOC_TREE_SEARCH_V2, args2);
> + if (ret != 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + sh = (struct btrfs_ioctl_search_header *) args2->buf;
> + num = sk->nr_items;
> +
> + dev_item = (struct btrfs_dev_item *) (sh + 1);
> + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> + if (!uuid_compare(dev_item->fsid, fsid)) {
> + rw_devs += 1;
> + info[idx++].devid = dev_item->devid;
> + }
> + if (idx > ndev) {
> + error("unexpected number of devices: %d >= %d", idx, ndev);
> + return -1;
> + }
> + sh = (struct btrfs_ioctl_search_header *) dev_item + 1;
> + dev_item = (struct btrfs_dev_item *) sh + 1;
> + }
> +
> + if (ndev != rw_devs)
> + error("unexpected number of devices: %d != %d", ndev, rw_devs);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * This function loads the device_info structure and put them in an array
> */
> @@ -718,19 +775,17 @@ static int load_device_info(int fd, struct device_info **device_info_ptr,
> return 1;
> }
>
> - for (i = 0, ndevs = 0 ; i <= fi_args.max_id ; i++) {
> - if (ndevs >= fi_args.num_devices) {
> - error("unexpected number of devices: %d >= %llu", ndevs,
> - (unsigned long long)fi_args.num_devices);
> - error(
> - "if seed device is used, try running this command as root");
> - goto out;
> - }
> + ret = load_devid(fd, info, fi_args.num_devices, fi_args.fsid);
> + if (ret == -1)
> + goto out;
> +
> + for (i = 0, ndevs = 0 ; i < fi_args.num_devices ; i++) {
> memset(&dev_info, 0, sizeof(dev_info));
> - ret = get_device_info(fd, i, &dev_info);
> + ret = get_device_info(fd, info[i].devid, &dev_info);
>
> - if (ret == -ENODEV)
> - continue;
> + if (ret == -ENODEV) {
> + error("device not found\n");
> + }
> if (ret) {
> error("cannot get info about device devid=%d", i);
> goto out;
> @@ -759,12 +814,6 @@ static int load_device_info(int fd, struct device_info **device_info_ptr,
> ++ndevs;
> }
>
> - if (ndevs != fi_args.num_devices) {
> - error("unexpected number of devices: %d != %llu", ndevs,
> - (unsigned long long)fi_args.num_devices);
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> qsort(info, fi_args.num_devices,
> sizeof(struct device_info), cmp_device_info);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-09 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-15 2:43 [PATCH v2] btrfs-progs: chunk tree search solution for btrfs249 Flint.Wang
2022-08-15 8:06 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-08-16 2:40 ` hmsjwzb
2022-08-16 5:18 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-09 6:24 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2022-12-09 9:14 ` hmsjwzb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f8043322-7a70-80ac-4a19-3945df839d9b@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=hmsjwzb@zoho.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox