From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] btrfs: sysfs: set / query btrfs chunk size
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 18:40:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe02d56b-f2cf-d9d7-8929-5744f11ce82c@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211203220445.2312182-1-shr@fb.com>
On 2021/12/4 06:04, Stefan Roesch wrote:
> The btrfs allocator is currently not ideal for all workloads. It tends
> to suffer from overallocating data block groups and underallocating
> metadata block groups. This results in filesystems becoming read-only
> even though there is plenty of "free" space.
>
> This is naturally confusing and distressing to users.
>
> Patches:
> 1) Store the chunk size in the btrfs_space_info structure
I guess it's too late, since the series is already in upstream, but I
believe we need to do some more review on this feature.
Firstly, I don't believe a single chunk_size (even it's per space-info)
is good enough.
The default chunk allocator has both checks on stripe_size and
chunk_size, but the series only added chunk_size knob, missing
stripe_size one.
It would be much better to add another stripe_size knob for it.
> 2) Add a sysfs entry to read and write the above information
> 3) Add a sysfs entry to force a space allocation
Any idea on how we handle the auto-reclaim on empty bgs?
AKA, what's preventing the newly allocated bgs from being immediately
reclaimed?
I didn't see any special handling in the 3rd patch.
> 4) Increase the default size of the metadata chunk allocation to 5GB
> for volumes greater than 50GB.
It would be better to also allow users to tweak the size threshold.
(E.g. allowing a knob for threshold on different chunk/stripe size
limits, along with above mentioned stripe size knob).
Thanks,
Qu
>
> Testing:
> A new test is being added to the xfstest suite. For reference the
> corresponding patch has the title:
> [PATCH] btrfs: Test chunk allocation with different sizes
>
> In addition also manual testing has been performed.
> - Run xfstests with the changes and the new test. It does not
> show new diffs.
> - Test with storage devices 10G, 20G, 30G, 50G, 60G
> - Default allocation
> - Increase of chunk size
> - If the stripe size is > the free space, it allocates
> free space - 1MB. The 1MB is left as free space.
> - If the device has a storage size > 50G, it uses a 5GB
> chunk size for new allocations.
>
> ---
> v6: - Update btrfs_force_chunk_alloc_store to use tree_root
> instead of extent_root.
> V5: - Changed the field name in the btrfs_space_info struct from
> default_chunk_size to chunk_size and made it atomic
> - Removed the compute_chunk_size_zoned function
> - Added further checks when writing /sys/fs/btrfs/<id>/allocation/<type>/chunk_size
> - Removed the ability to query /sys/fs/btrfs/<id>/allocation/<type>/force_alloc_chunk
>
> V4: - Patch email contained duplicate entries.
>
> V3: - Rename sysfs entry from stripe_size to chunk_size
> - Remove max_chunk_size field in data structure btrfs_space_info
> - Rename max_stripe_size field to default_chunk_size in data
> structure btrfs_space_info
> - Remove max_chunk_size logic
> - Use stripe_size = chunk_size
>
> V2:
> - Split the patch in 4 patches
> - Added checks for zone volumes in sysfs.c
> - Replaced the BUG() with ASSERT()
> - Changed if with fallthrough
> - Removed comments in space-info.h
> --
> Stefan Roesch (4):
> btrfs: store chunk size in space-info struct.
> btrfs: expose chunk size in sysfs.
> btrfs: add force_chunk_alloc sysfs entry to force allocation
> btrfs: increase metadata alloc size to 5GB for volumes > 50GB
>
> fs/btrfs/space-info.c | 41 ++++++++++++
> fs/btrfs/space-info.h | 3 +
> fs/btrfs/sysfs.c | 152 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 28 +++-----
> 4 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>
> base-commit: 87c673b657a7e4784fb7274a77a8529712232d0c
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-18 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-03 22:04 [PATCH v6 0/4] btrfs: sysfs: set / query btrfs chunk size Stefan Roesch
2021-12-03 22:04 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] btrfs: store chunk size in space-info struct Stefan Roesch
2022-07-22 23:49 ` Wang Yugui
2022-07-25 13:41 ` David Sterba
2022-07-25 22:25 ` Wang Yugui
2022-07-26 17:08 ` David Sterba
2022-07-29 1:23 ` Wang Yugui
2022-07-29 2:05 ` Wang Yugui
2022-07-29 3:14 ` Wang Yugui
2022-07-29 4:44 ` Wang Yugui
2022-08-18 6:32 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-12-03 22:04 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] btrfs: expose chunk size in sysfs Stefan Roesch
2021-12-03 22:04 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] btrfs: add force_chunk_alloc sysfs entry to force allocation Stefan Roesch
2021-12-03 22:04 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] btrfs: increase metadata alloc size to 5GB for volumes > 50GB Stefan Roesch
2022-08-18 10:40 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe02d56b-f2cf-d9d7-8929-5744f11ce82c@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shr@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).