From: None None <whocares0101@freemail.hu>
To: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs balance start -dconvert=raid5 on raid1 not converting to raid5
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 05:56:50 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <freemail.20150425055650.78792.2@fmxmldata05.freemail.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150425030040.GA4756@mew>
Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> írta:
>On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 04:47:31AM +0200, None None wrote:
>> I tried to convert my btrfs from raid1 to raid5 but after the balance command it's still raid1.
>> Also for raid56 the wiki says "Parity may be inconsistent after a crash (the "write hole")"
>> does that mean if I convert metadata to raid5/6 and the parity becomes inconsistent my btrfs will be lost?
>>
>> Kernel is v4.0 on debian/sid
>> The filesystem was created with nodesize 8k if I remember correctly
>> Mount options for /srv/ noatime,nodev,space_cache,subvol=@
>> No snapshots and only a few subvolumes
>> Free space is ~450GiB
>>
>> To convert the data profile to raid5 (with btrfs-progs v3.17) I did
>> btrfs balance start -v -dconvert=raid5 /srv/
>> but after the the command was done (after 10 days)
>> btrfs fi sho /srv/
>> still shows data as raid1, free space is also what would be expected for raid1
>> no errors, no problems, no raid5
>>
>>
>> So I compiled the newer btrfs-progs v3.19.1 and did (I also tried raid6, same result still raid1)
>> btrfs balance start -v -dconvert=raid5 -dlimit=1 /srv/
>> Dumping filters: flags 0x1, state 0x0, force is off
>> DATA (flags 0x120): converting, target=128, soft is off, limit=1
>> Done, had to relocate 1 out of 12071 chunks
>>
>> dmesg shows only this, no errors
>> [170427.207107] BTRFS info (device sdj): relocating block group 65294058848256 flags 17
>> [170461.591056] BTRFS info (device sdj): found 129 extents
>> [170476.270765] BTRFS info (device sdj): found 129 extents
>>
>> btrfs fi sho /srv/
>> shows all data as raid1
>>
>>
>> btrfs fi sho
>> Label: none uuid: xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Total devices 9 FS bytes used 11.78TiB
>> devid 1 size 2.73TiB used 2.62TiB path /dev/sdh
>> devid 2 size 2.73TiB used 2.62TiB path /dev/sdj
>> devid 3 size 2.73TiB used 2.62TiB path /dev/sdg
>> devid 4 size 2.73TiB used 2.62TiB path /dev/sdi
>> devid 5 size 2.73TiB used 2.62TiB path /dev/sdf
>> devid 6 size 2.73TiB used 2.62TiB path /dev/sde
>> devid 7 size 2.73TiB used 2.62TiB path /dev/sdc
>> devid 9 size 2.73TiB used 2.62TiB path /dev/sdd
>> devid 10 size 2.73TiB used 2.62TiB path /dev/sda
>>
>> btrfs-progs v3.19.1
>>
>>
>> btrfs fi df /srv/
>> Data, RAID1: total=11.76TiB, used=11.76TiB
>> System, RAID1: total=32.00MiB, used=1.62MiB
>> Metadata, RAID1: total=17.06GiB, used=14.85GiB
>> GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=0.00B
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>This is a known bug in v4.0. I sent in a patch [1] to revert the commit
>that caused the regression, but it didn't get any response. You could
>apply that or just revert 2f0810880f08 ("btrfs: delete chunk allocation
>attemp when setting block group ro") to fix your problem for now.
>
>[1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6238111/
>
>--
>Omar
I'll give it a try, thanks for the fast reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-25 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-25 2:47 btrfs balance start -dconvert=raid5 on raid1 not converting to raid5 None None
2015-04-25 3:00 ` Omar Sandoval
2015-04-25 3:56 ` None None [this message]
2015-04-25 8:18 ` Duncan
2015-04-25 9:39 ` Omar Sandoval
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=freemail.20150425055650.78792.2@fmxmldata05.freemail.hu \
--to=whocares0101@freemail.hu \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).