From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lubos Kolouch <lubos.kolouch@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Question of stability
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:10:08 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <i77iv0$9a5$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <7280394.123.1284845879623.JavaMail.root@zimbra>
	<4C96B682.5080900@csamuel.org> <i77ero$lja$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<20100920113057.GC27633@think>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +0000, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
>> No, not stable!
>> 
>> Again, after powerloss, I have *two* damaged btrfs filesystems.
> 
> Please tell me more about your system.  I do extensive power fail
> testing here without problems, and corruptions after powerloss are very
> often caused by the actual hardware.
> 
> So, what kind of drives do you have, do they have writeback caching on,
> and what are you layering on top of the drive between btrfs and the
> kernel?
> 
> -chris
> 

Hello Chris,

The system is running with 128GB SDD Samsung disk. The partition is 
encrypted with LUKS and on top btrfs filesystem is created.

The backup disk is a 160GB WD notebook disk connected via IDE->USB cable,
whole formatted with LUKS and btrfs on top.

Actually, if there was any way (non-standard) how to mount the system and 
recover even part of the data, I would be very grateful.

Lubos