From: Kai Krakow <hurikhan77+btrfs@gmail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Provide a better free space estimate on RAID1
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:50:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jdlisa-rt7.ln1@hurikhan77.spdns.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 2016480.0iFfLibb6i@merkaba
Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de> schrieb:
> While I understand that there is *never* a guarentee that a given free
> space can really be allocated by a process cause other processes can
> allocate space as well in the mean time, and while I understand that its
> difficult to provide an accurate to provide exact figures as soon as RAID
> settings can be set per subvolume, it still think its important to improve
> on the figures.
The question here: Does the free space indicator "fail" predictably or
inpredictably? It will do the latter with this change.
--
Replies to list only preferred.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-08 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-05 20:15 Provide a better free space estimate on RAID1 Roman Mamedov
2014-02-06 7:38 ` Brendan Hide
2014-02-06 12:45 ` Roman Mamedov
2014-02-06 19:54 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-07 4:40 ` Roman Mamedov
2014-02-07 5:30 ` Chris Murphy
2014-02-07 6:08 ` Roman Mamedov
2014-02-07 18:44 ` Chris Murphy
2014-02-08 21:46 ` Kai Krakow
2014-02-08 11:21 ` Roman Mamedov
2014-02-07 10:02 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-02-08 21:50 ` Kai Krakow [this message]
2014-02-08 15:46 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-08 16:36 ` [PATCH][V2] " Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-09 17:20 ` [PATCH][V3] Provide a better free space estimate [was]Re: " Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-07 14:05 ` Frank Kingswood
2014-02-06 20:21 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-07 20:32 ` Kai Krakow
2014-02-08 11:33 ` Roman Mamedov
2014-02-08 11:46 ` Hugo Mills
2014-02-08 21:35 ` Kai Krakow
2014-02-08 22:10 ` Roman Mamedov
2014-02-08 22:45 ` cwillu
2014-02-08 23:27 ` Kai Krakow
2014-02-08 23:32 ` Kai Krakow
2014-02-09 1:08 ` Roman Mamedov
2014-02-09 9:39 ` Kai Krakow
2014-02-09 6:38 ` Duncan
2014-02-09 9:20 ` Roman Mamedov
2014-02-10 0:02 ` Duncan
2014-02-10 9:14 ` Roman Mamedov
2014-02-09 9:37 ` Kai Krakow
2014-02-08 23:17 ` Kai Krakow
2014-02-09 1:55 ` Roman Mamedov
2014-02-09 2:21 ` Chris Murphy
2014-02-09 2:29 ` Chris Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jdlisa-rt7.ln1@hurikhan77.spdns.de \
--to=hurikhan77+btrfs@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).