Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bardur Arantsson <spam@scientician.net>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Another defrag question
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:58:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <kg61p4$jsi$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51265DB0.2060407@petaramesh.org>

On 02/21/2013 06:47 PM, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
> Le 21/02/2013 18:25, Hugo Mills a écrit :
>> Correct. But btrfs isn't at that stage yet. It's getting visibly
>> closer, but it's not quite there. Hence the very strong recommendation
>> to keep up with the latest code. Hugo. 
> 
> The matter is that BTRFS had many early adopters just because it is -
> and has been for long now - in the mainline Linux kernel, so supposed
> stable and good choice for the future.
> 
> To be honest (and not wanting to troll, promised) this is the only
> single reason for which I use BTRFS on 5 of my 6 machines at home - just
> because I thought that "Just upgrade the distro every 6 months and it
> will become better and better over time, no hassle, make my life easy".
> 

Unfortunately many distros don't make it obvious, but Btrfs is still
hidden behind a giant EXPERIMENTAL label in the kernel configuration.

Regards,



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-21 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-21 15:46 Another defrag question Swâmi Petaramesh
2013-02-21 15:50 ` Liu Bo
2013-02-21 15:55   ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2013-02-21 15:54 ` Calvin Walton
2013-02-21 16:01   ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2013-02-21 16:09     ` Blair Zajac
2013-02-21 16:38     ` Hugo Mills
2013-02-21 17:03       ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2013-02-21 17:25         ` Hugo Mills
2013-02-21 17:47           ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2013-02-21 20:46             ` Hugo Mills
2013-02-21 20:58             ` Bardur Arantsson [this message]
2013-02-21 21:56               ` David Sterba
2013-02-22  5:55                 ` Bardur Arantsson
2013-02-21 21:31             ` Johannes Hirte

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='kg61p4$jsi$1@ger.gmane.org' \
    --to=spam@scientician.net \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox