Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sam tygier <samtygier@yahoo.co.uk>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] RAID-level terminology change
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:55:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <khj6gq$nan$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362861071-12589-1-git-send-email-hugo@carfax.org.uk>

On 09/03/13 20:31, Hugo Mills wrote:
>    Some time ago, and occasionally since, we've discussed altering the
> "RAID-n" terminology to change it to an "nCmSpP" format, where n is the
> number of copies, m is the number of (data) devices in a stripe per copy,
> and p is the number of parity devices in a stripe.
> 
>    The current kernel implementation uses as many devices as it can in the
> striped modes (RAID-0, -10, -5, -6), and in this implementation, that is
> written as "mS" (with a literal "m"). The mS and pP sections are omitted
> if the value is 1S or 0P.
> 
>    The magic look-up table for old-style / new-style is:
> 
> single 		 1C (or omitted, in btrfs fi df output)
> RAID-0		 1CmS
> RAID-1		 2C
> DUP			 2CD
> RAID-10		 2CmS
> RAID-5		 1CmS1P
> RAID-6		 1CmS2P

Are these the only valid options? Are 'sensible' new levels (eg 3C, mirrored to 3 disk or 1CmS3P, like raid6 with but with 3 parity blocks) allowed? Are any arbitrary levels allowed (some other comments in the thread suggest no)? Will there be a recommended (or supported) set?




  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-10 23:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-09 20:31 [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] RAID-level terminology change Hugo Mills
2013-03-09 20:31 ` [PATCH 1/5] Use nCmSpP format for mkfs Hugo Mills
2013-03-09 20:31 ` [PATCH 2/5] Move parse_profile to utils.c Hugo Mills
2013-03-09 20:31 ` [PATCH 3/5] Convert balance filter parser to use common nCmSpP replication-level parser Hugo Mills
2013-03-09 20:31 ` [PATCH 4/5] Change output of btrfs fi df to report new (or old) RAID names Hugo Mills
2013-03-09 20:31 ` [PATCH 5/5] Add man page description for nCmSpP replication levels Hugo Mills
2013-03-10 14:01   ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-03-10 17:20     ` Hugo Mills
2013-03-10 17:52       ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-03-09 21:38 ` [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] RAID-level terminology change Harald Glatt
     [not found] ` <CAFWF=am4ki529Zez4123gYk3BD+Z9RONRpAK7NZe=skHzcdMiw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-03-09 21:46   ` Hugo Mills
2013-03-09 22:25 ` Roger Binns
2013-03-10  1:44   ` Hugo Mills
2013-03-10  5:41     ` Roger Binns
2013-03-10  6:29       ` Harald Glatt
2013-03-10  6:37         ` Harald Glatt
2013-03-10 11:31           ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-03-10 11:48           ` Roger Binns
2013-03-10 22:04       ` Hugo Mills
2013-03-11  0:21         ` Roger Binns
2013-03-27  4:27           ` Brendan Hide
2013-03-27  5:24             ` Roger Binns
2013-03-10 11:23 ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-03-10 14:11   ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-03-10 21:36   ` Hugo Mills
2013-03-10 21:45     ` Harald Glatt
2013-03-10 22:59       ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-03-10 22:06         ` Harald Glatt
2013-03-10 23:06   ` Diego Calleja
2013-03-10 15:43 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-03-10 22:24   ` Hugo Mills
2013-03-10 22:42     ` Harald Glatt
2013-03-10 23:40   ` sam tygier
2013-03-10 23:49     ` Hugo Mills
2013-03-11 14:14       ` David Sterba
2013-03-10 23:55 ` sam tygier [this message]
2013-03-11  8:56   ` Hugo Mills

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='khj6gq$nan$1@ger.gmane.org' \
    --to=samtygier@yahoo.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox