From: Martin <m_btrfs@ml1.co.uk>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs raid1 on 16TB goes read-only after "btrfs: block rsv returned -28"
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 22:12:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <koo9jq$na8$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130605162443.GE18160@twin.jikos.cz>
On 05/06/13 17:24, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 04:43:29PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
>> OK, so you've got plenty of space to allocate. There were some
>> issues in this area (block reserves and ENOSPC, and I think
>> specifically addressing the issue of ENOSPC when there's space
>> available to allocate) that were fixed between 3.8 and 3.9 (and
>> probably some between 3.9 and 3.10-rc as well), so upgrading your
>> kernel _may_ help here.
>
> This is supposed to be fixed by
> https://patchwork-mail2.kernel.org/patch/2558911/
>
> that went ti 3.10-rc with some followup patches, so it might not be
> enough as a standalone fix.
>
> Unless you really need 'inode_cache', remove it from the mount options.
Thanks for that. Remounting without the inode_cache option looks to be
allowing rsync to continue. (No sync loop needed.)
For a 16TB raid1 on kernel 3.8.13, any good mount options to try?
For that size of storage and with many hard links, is there any
advantage formatting with leaf/node size greater than the default 4kBytes?
Thanks,
Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-05 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-05 14:57 btrfs raid1 on 16TB goes read-only after "btrfs: block rsv returned -28" Martin
2013-06-05 15:05 ` Hugo Mills
2013-06-05 15:28 ` Martin
2013-06-05 15:43 ` Hugo Mills
2013-06-05 15:59 ` Martin
2013-06-05 16:04 ` Hugo Mills
2013-06-05 16:24 ` David Sterba
2013-06-05 21:12 ` Martin [this message]
2013-06-07 23:14 ` Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='koo9jq$na8$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=m_btrfs@ml1.co.uk \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).