linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin <m_btrfs@ml1.co.uk>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Corrupt btrfs filesystem recovery... What best instructions?
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 16:43:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <l2mnmf$us$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <l2k7kd$1dh$1@ger.gmane.org>

What best to try next?

mount "-o recovery,noatime"

btrfsck:
    --repair                    try to repair the filesystem
    --init-csum-tree            create a new CRC tree
    --init-extent-tree          create a new extent tree

or is a "scrub" worthwhile?


The fail and switch to read-only occured whilst trying to delete a known
bad directory tree. No worries for losing the data in that.

But how best to clean up the filesystem errors?


Thanks,
Martin




On 03/10/13 17:56, Martin wrote:
> On 03/10/13 01:49, Martin wrote:
> 
>> Summary:
>>
>> Mounting "-o recovery,noatime" worked well and allowed a diff check to
>> complete for all but one directory tree. So very nearly all the data is
>> fine.
>>
>> Deleting the failed directory tree caused a call stack dump and eventually:
>>
>> kernel: parent transid verify failed on 915444822016 wanted 16974 found
>> 13021
>> kernel: BTRFS info (device sdc): failed to delete reference to
>> eggdrop-1.6.19.ebuild, inode 2096893 parent 5881667
>> kernel: BTRFS error (device sdc) in __btrfs_unlink_inode:3662: errno=-5
>> IO failure
>> kernel: BTRFS info (device sdc): forced readonly
>>
>>
>> Greater detail listed below.
>>
>> What next best to try?
>>
>> Safer to try again but this time with with "no_space_cache,no_inode_cache"?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Martin
> 
> 
>> Next best step to try?
>>
>> Remount "-o recovery,noatime" again?
> 
> 
> In the meantime, trying:
> 
> btrfsck /dev/sdc
> 
> gave the following output + abort:
> 
> parent transid verify failed on 915444523008 wanted 16974 found 13021
> Ignoring transid failure
> btrfsck: cmds-check.c:1066: process_file_extent: Assertion `!(rec->ino
> != key->objectid || rec->refs > 1)' failed.
> id not match free space cache generation (1625)
> free space inode generation (0) did not match free space cache
> generation (1607)
> free space inode generation (0) did not match free space cache
> generation (1604)
> free space inode generation (0) did not match free space cache
> generation (1606)
> free space inode generation (0) did not match free space cache
> generation (1620)
> free space inode generation (0) did not match free space cache
> generation (1626)
> free space inode generation (0) did not match free space cache
> generation (1609)
> free space inode generation (0) did not match free space cache
> generation (1653)
> free space inode generation (0) did not match free space cache
> generation (1628)
> free space inode generation (0) did not match free space cache
> generation (1628)
> free space inode generation (0) did not match free space cache
> generation (1649)
> 
> 
> (There was no syslog output.)
> 
> Full btrfsck listing attached.
> 
> 
> Suggestions please?
> 
> Thanks,
> Martin




  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-04 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-28 19:26 Corrupt btrfs filesystem recovery... (Due to *sata* errors) Martin
2013-09-28 20:51 ` Chris Murphy
2013-09-28 22:51   ` Martin
2013-09-29  2:06     ` Chris Murphy
2013-09-29  2:31       ` Martin
2013-09-28 22:54 ` Martin
2013-09-29  2:10   ` Corrupt btrfs filesystem recovery... What best instructions? Martin
2013-09-29  5:11     ` Duncan
2013-09-29 21:29       ` Martin
2013-09-29 21:55         ` Martin
2013-09-30  7:51           ` Duncan
2013-10-03  0:49         ` Martin
2013-10-03  1:31           ` Chris Murphy
2013-10-03 16:56           ` Martin
2013-10-04 15:43             ` Martin [this message]
2013-10-05 11:32               ` Martin
2013-10-05 13:18                 ` Martin
2013-10-07 14:56                   ` btrfsck --repair --init-extent-tree: segfault error 4 Martin
2013-10-07 19:03                     ` Chris Murphy
2013-10-09 16:03                       ` Martin
2013-10-05 12:05 ` ASM1083 rev01 PCIe to PCI Bridge chip (Was: Corrupt btrfs filesystem recovery... (Due to *sata* errors)) Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='l2mnmf$us$1@ger.gmane.org' \
    --to=m_btrfs@ml1.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).