linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin <m_btrfs@ml1.co.uk>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs raid multiple devices IO utilisation
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:08:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <l8eprt$u46$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan$46d7a$8ee1d67e$83395712$322d43d@cox.net>

On 13/12/13 09:13, Duncan wrote:
> Martin posted on Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:39:00 +0000 as excerpted:
> 
>> Some time back, I noticed that with a two HDD btrfs raid1, some tasks
>> suffered ALL the IO getting choked onto just one HDD!
>>
>> That turned out to be a feature of the btrfs code whereby a device is
>> chosen depending on the process ID. For some cases such as in a bash
>> loop, the PID increments by two for each iteration and so only one HDD
>> ever gets hit...
> 
> Unfortunately, yes...


> ... Of course that's if the queue 
> length is reasonably accessible to btrfs, as you already asked in the bit 
> I snipped as out of my knowledgeable reply range.

And that's the bit that is outside of my knowledge... Hence the question.

Here's hoping someone can give a pointer before I need to delve into
other code such as for 'atop' to see how it is done there if I'm to take
a stab at it.

Or if someone is already coding something up, please let us know?


Or:

>From within btrfs code, is there an easy/fast/any way to check the IO
queue length for whatever btrfs target device?

Regards,
Martin




  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-13 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-12 13:39 btrfs raid multiple devices IO utilisation Martin
2013-12-13  9:13 ` Duncan
2013-12-13 11:08   ` Martin [this message]
2013-12-13 17:24 ` Chris Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='l8eprt$u46$1@ger.gmane.org' \
    --to=m_btrfs@ml1.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).