From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yalonda Gishtaka Subject: Re: Honest timeline for btrfsck Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:39:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1312404713-sup-6548@shiny> <1313700115-sup-2457@shiny> <20110818212212.GA14473@carfax.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Return-path: List-ID: Hugo Mills carfax.org.uk> writes: > > If this is in decent shape, it's probably worth it to release it in > its current form anyway (and possibly request a moratorium on extra > patches until you've finished the optimisation). I suspect that > there's a number of people out there who wouldn't mind the speed > issues just to get a filesystem back. I second this. I'd rather have a slow btrfsck tool than just the promise of one that rivals the Duke Nukem Forever release schedule.