From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:59457 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753490Ab2JaMU5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:20:57 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TTXI8-0004jF-Iu for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:21:04 +0100 Received: from 78-32-127-104.static.enta.net ([78-32-127-104.static.enta.net]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:21:04 +0100 Received: from alex by 78-32-127-104.static.enta.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:21:04 +0100 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Alex Subject: (late) REQUEST: Default mkfs.btrfs block size Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Greetings! As one 'stuck' with 4k leaves on my main machine for the moment, can I request the btrfs-progs v0.20 defaults to more efficient decent block sizes before release. Most distro install programs for the moment don't give access to the options at install time and there seems to be is a significant advantage to 16k or 32k I know you're at -rc stage but I hope that this is a no brainer. ;-) Kind regards.