From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43757 "EHLO plane.gmane.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S934215AbcATPMX (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 20 Jan 2016 10:12:23 -0500
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gcfb-btrfs-devel-moved1-2@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1aLuQn-0003gM-Ab
	for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:12:21 +0100
Received: from 87-127-115-15.static.enta.net ([87.127.115.15])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:12:21 +0100
Received: from 6401e46d by 87-127-115-15.static.enta.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:12:21 +0100
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
From: Al <6401e46d@opayq.com>
Subject: Re: Why is dedup inline, not delayed (as opposed to offline)? Explain like I'm five pls.
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:12:09 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <loom.20160120T161107-907@post.gmane.org>
References: <loom.20160116T132316-196@post.gmane.org> <569C41B1.1090206@cn.fujitsu.com> <pan$9ea8b$cdf4a5be$a6b3ced0$e73fd4ce@cox.net> <569C58FB.70407@cn.fujitsu.com> <pan$9dd9b$58cdc4a$94401f0f$f97ce29e@cox.net> <569CDF0D.9030609@gmail.com> <pan$9821b$e84a8fc3$23a877ef$2b0858e0@cox.net> <569E2A44.3040109@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

Sometimes it's the odd OT posts that are the most interesting!