From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:36909 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965192AbcAUOxk (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:53:40 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aMGcD-0003K0-N3 for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:53:37 +0100 Received: from 87-127-115-15.static.enta.net ([87.127.115.15]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:53:37 +0100 Received: from 6401e46d by 87-127-115-15.static.enta.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:53:37 +0100 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Al <6401e46d@opayq.com> Subject: Re: Why is dedup inline, not delayed (as opposed to offline)? Explain like I'm five pls. Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 14:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <56A0956B.7060706@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: >> Al posted on Sat, 16 Jan 2016 12:27:16 +0000 as excerpted: > > > > .. unless you're really short of > > block dev space (!), which is a pretty naff dedup strategy, > > I'm looking forward to using it; keep up the very good work. > If you really think the design is naff, I'm very glad if you can provide > a better one. Wenruo, I would suggest that you concentrate on your English comprehension before you reply in such a manner. You also appear to have replied to a thank-you message directed at another person. Address your emotional problems in a more appropriate place. As I said before, > > I'm looking forward to using [dedup]; keep up the very good work.