From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:38011 "EHLO mail-wm0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756329AbcIPHNu (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2016 03:13:50 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id 1so23910502wmz.1 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:13:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Helmut Eller To: Nicholas D Steeves Subject: Re: Is stability a joke? References: <57D51BF9.2010907@online.no> <57D53E3A.1030106@online.no> <15194548.valIGHoaRh@merkaba> <2682119.DRdtbgPpNZ@merkaba> <57D55072.2010701@online.no> <20160911130221.GE7138@carfax.org.uk> <20160915010552.GC32452@DigitalMercury.dynalias.net> CC: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:13:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20160915010552.GC32452@DigitalMercury.dynalias.net> (Nicholas D. Steeves's message of "Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:05:52 -0400") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 14 2016, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Do you think the broader btrfs > community is interested in citations and curated links to discussions? I'm definitely interested. Something I would love to see is a list or description of the tests that a particular version of btrfs passes or doesn't pass. I think that would add a bit of "rationality" to the issue. Also interesting would be the results of test-suites that are used for other filesystems (ext4, xfs). Helmut