From: sam tygier <samtygier@yahoo.co.uk>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] Btrfs: Check metadata redundancy on balance
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 09:25:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <n467lf$t3g$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
Resending as previous comments did not need any changes.
Currently BTRFS allows you to make bad choices of data and
metadata levels. For example -d raid1 -m raid0 means you can
only use half your total disk space, but will loose everything
if 1 disk fails. It should give a warning in these cases.
This patch is a follow up to
[PATCH v2] btrfs-progs: check metadata redundancy
in order to cover the case of using balance to convert to such
a set of raid levels.
A simple example to hit this is to create a single device fs,
which will default to single:dup, then to add a second device and
attempt to convert to raid1 with the command
btrfs balance start -dconvert=raid1 /mnt
this will result in a filesystem with raid1:dup, which will not
survive the loss of one drive. I personally don't see why the tools
should allow this, but in the previous thread a warning was
considered sufficient.
Changes in v2
Use btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures()
Signed-off-by: Sam Tygier <samtygier@yahoo.co.uk>
From: Sam Tygier <samtygier@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 16:43:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: Check metadata redundancy on balance
When converting a filesystem via balance check that metadata mode
is at least as redundant as the data mode. For example give warning
when:
-dconvert=raid1 -mconvert=single
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 6fc73586..40247e9 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -3584,6 +3584,12 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_balance_control *bctl,
}
} while (read_seqretry(&fs_info->profiles_lock, seq));
+ if (btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(bctl->meta.target) <
+ btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(bctl->data.target)) {
+ btrfs_info(fs_info,
+ "Warning: metatdata has lower redundancy than data\n");
+ }
+
if (bctl->sys.flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT) {
fs_info->num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = min(
btrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(fs_info),
--
2.4.3
next reply other threads:[~2015-12-08 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-08 9:25 sam tygier [this message]
2016-01-05 14:41 ` [PATCH v2] Btrfs: Check metadata redundancy on balance David Sterba
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-11-03 9:28 sam tygier
2015-10-03 15:50 sam tygier
2015-10-05 2:33 ` Anand Jain
2015-10-07 8:19 ` sam tygier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='n467lf$t3g$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=samtygier@yahoo.co.uk \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).