From: Matthias Bodenbinder <matthias@bodenbinder.de>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question: raid1 behaviour on failure
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:40:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nfb39q$iv0$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <180d89ae-32cf-ad59-2b6e-56ed82e9f439@cn.fujitsu.com>
Am 21.04.2016 um 07:43 schrieb Qu Wenruo:
> There are already unmerged patches which will partly do the mdadm level behavior, like automatically change to degraded mode without making the fs RO.
>
> The original patchset:
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/48335
The description of thix patch says:
"Although the one-size-fit-all solution is quite safe, it's too strict if
data and metadata has different duplication level."
...
"This patchset will introduce a new per-chunk degradable check for btrfs,
allow above case to succeed, and it's quite small anyway."
My raid1 is "-m raid1 -d raid1". Both the same duplication level. Would that patch make any difference?
And: What do I need to do to test this in "debian stable"? I am not a programmer - but I know how to use git and how to compile with proper configuration directions.
Matthias
> Or the latest patchset inside Anand Jain's auto-replace patchset:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/55446
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-21 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-18 5:06 Question: raid1 behaviour on failure Matthias Bodenbinder
2016-04-18 7:22 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-04-20 5:17 ` Matthias Bodenbinder
2016-04-20 7:25 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-04-21 5:22 ` Matthias Bodenbinder
2016-04-21 5:43 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-04-21 6:02 ` Liu Bo
2016-04-21 6:09 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-04-21 17:40 ` Matthias Bodenbinder [this message]
2016-04-22 6:02 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-04-23 7:07 ` Matthias Bodenbinder
2016-04-23 7:17 ` Matthias Bodenbinder
2016-04-26 8:17 ` Satoru Takeuchi
2016-04-26 15:16 ` Henk Slager
2016-04-20 13:32 ` Anand Jain
2016-04-21 5:15 ` Matthias Bodenbinder
2016-04-21 7:19 ` Anand Jain
2016-04-21 6:23 ` Satoru Takeuchi
2016-04-21 11:09 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-04-21 11:28 ` Henk Slager
2016-04-21 17:27 ` Matthias Bodenbinder
2016-04-26 16:19 ` Henk Slager
2016-04-26 16:42 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2016-04-28 5:12 ` Matthias Bodenbinder
2016-04-28 5:24 ` Gareth Pye
2016-04-28 8:08 ` Duncan
2016-04-28 5:09 ` Matthias Bodenbinder
2016-04-28 19:14 ` Henk Slager
[not found] ` <57188534.1070408@jp.fujitsu.com>
2016-04-21 11:58 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-04-22 2:21 ` Satoru Takeuchi
2016-04-22 5:32 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-04-22 6:17 ` Satoru Takeuchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='nfb39q$iv0$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=matthias@bodenbinder.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).