From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from [195.159.176.226] ([195.159.176.226]:37992 "EHLO blaine.gmane.org" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750816AbdHMPFN (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Aug 2017 11:05:13 -0400 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dguRr-0003dT-Gt for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 17:05:03 +0200 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Adam Hunt Subject: lazytime mount =?CP1251?Q?option=97no?= support in Btrfs Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 11:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Back in 2014 Ted Tso introduced the lazytime mount option for ext4 and shortly thereafter a more generic VFS implementation which was then merged into mainline. His early patches included support for Btrfs but those changes were removed prior to the feature being merged. His changelog includes the following note about the removal: - Per Christoph's suggestion, drop support for btrfs and xfs for now, issues with how btrfs and xfs handle dirty inode tracking. We can add btrfs and xfs support back later or at the end of this series if we want to revisit this decision. My reading of the current mainline shows that Btrfs still lacks any support for lazytime. Has any thought been given to adding support for lazytime to Btrfs? Thanks, Adam